Soccer GPS Vests: A Detailed Technical Comparison

OK, let's unpack this. Imagine you're stepping onto the

soccer pitch. Maybe it's a casual game with

friends, maybe a crucial league match, or, you know, just a solo

training session. For the longest time,

understanding your performance was really about, well, feel,

wasn't it? Yeah, totally subjective.

What you thought you did, what the coach maybe caught some

quick notes perhaps? Exactly how far did you feel

like you ran? Did that Sprint feel fast?

It's all gut feeling. And while that subjective layer,

that feel for the game, the coach's eye, that's absolutely

vital in soccer, don't get me wrong.

Oh, for sure. But it lacks that hard,

objective reality that, well, data brings.

It just leaves so much open to interpretation, doesn't it?

It really does. But now technology is stepping

in, bringing that hard data right into the game, and not

just for the elite pros anymore, but really for players at, you

know, every level. We're talking about knowing

precisely how many sprints you hit, exactly where you spent

most of your time on the field. You know, the heat maps.

Ah. Yes, heat maps always revealing.

And how much physical workload you actually put on your body.

Your true top speed all validated by a sensor you're

wearing. And this shift, this move

towards objective measurement, it's fundamentally changing how

players and coaches approach development, approach training.

Also. Well, they're using these tools

to get a clear, unbiased picture of performance, identifying

real, tangible areas for improvement, and tracking

progress based on actual numbers, not just guesswork.

And right at the heart of this shift, especially for individual

players, are these GPS tracking systems, usually where I'm in a

little vest. That's the common set up, yeah.

A comfortable vest with a pocket for the tracker.

And they're making the kind of insights that used to be locked

away in like pro sports science labs accessible to you, the

player actually on the field. They basically take the

guesswork out of the physical side of things.

Pretty much, and it goes beyond just how far did I run.

It helps you understand the quality of that movement.

Quality, OK. Yeah.

So it informs everything from tweaking your training drills to

understanding your tactical positioning better and even

providing data points that can, you know, help manage recovery

and potentially prevent injuries down the line by looking at

load. That's huge.

Injury prevention is always key. Absolutely.

So for this deep dive, we've really dug into what's out there

in this well, this evolving world of wearable performance

tracking for soccer. Yeah, it's a busy space we're.

Going to look at what these systems actually offer, how they

differ because they do differ quite a bit, who they're best

suited for and maybe most importantly, what adopting this

kind of tech could actually mean for your game, whether you're

playing casually down the park or, you know, really pushing to

reach a higher level. And we found some really

interesting examples systems that approach the market from,

let's say, different angles, which really highlights the

range of options available now. So our goal here is basically to

lay it all out, Cut through the jargon, the pricing models and

give you a clearview of the landscape.

Exactly so you can think about what might be the right fit, if

any, for your own ambitions and your own budget.

OK, let's jump in. It really is fascinating, isn't

it, how the analysis of soccer performance has just transformed

completely? You know, it used to be almost

entirely based on like, intuition and just visual

feedback, a coach watching maybe some basic stats after the game.

Yeah, the eye test. The eye test exactly Now, thanks

mainly to GPS becoming so accessible and accurate, we can

capture this incredibly detailed movement data.

It allows for a much, much more granular analysis of what's

actually happening out there on the pitch.

And because the tech exists, you've got different companies

building systems with, well, slightly different philosophies

it seems. That's a good way to put it.

Looking at the options we explored, they seem to fall into

I'd say 3 pretty distinct categories based on how they're

trying to get this tech to the players.

OK. What are those categories?

Well, first, there's an approach that's clearly focused on broad

accessibility. Their whole mission seems to be

about democratizing data. Democratizing data.

I like that. Making it available for, well,

everyone. Retty much making erformance

tracking a realistic otion for almost anyone who lays the game.

Got it. What's the second type?

Then there's a category that comes from deep roots in

professional sports science. They take technology that's, you

know, trusted by the pros, as their marketing often says,

right? You see that type and they

specifically design it for you. The aim is to bring that kind of

elite level insight down to individual players, maybe

amateur teams. So taking the high end knowledge

and packaging it up for let's say the serious amateur.

Exactly. And the third category we looked

at, well, it isn't really a consumer product in the same

way. It represents the absolute

pinnacle, the professional grade systems used at the very highest

levels of the sport, often with formal certifications like from

FIFA that you wouldn't typically find or necessarily need for

consumer gear. But it's important context,

right to know what the top end looks like.

Absolutely essential for context.

It shows you what the technology is ultimately capable of.

That makes perfect sense. And seeing these different

approaches, these categories, it immediately tells you how the

market is segmented. Manufacturers have clearly built

different things for different people, different needs,

different budgets. Oh, definitely.

And you see this segmentation maybe most obviously in the

pricing structure is quite revealing.

How so? Well, you see one model that's

just a straightforward one time purchase price for the hardware.

You buy the device, you own it, simple enough.

Then you have the subscription model where you're paying

usually an annual fee to access the software, the data analysis,

maybe extra features, content. Right, the ongoing cost model.

Exactly. And then that third tier, the

professional level that operates on a totally different basis.

It's B to B, business to business with customized

negotiated pricing for teams or leagues.

So the pricing itself gives you a big clue about what you're

actually buying into. It really does that low upfront

cost, the one time purchase, it might just get you the basic

hardware and the Core Data capture, which might be all you

need. But the subscription model, that

annual fee often means you're paying for a continuous service.

You're funding ongoing software updates, potentially new

features down the line, maybe access to training plans or

community features. So it's a higher cost over time,

definitely, but it could offer more value beyond just the raw

numbers if that's what you're looking for.

You're buying into an ecosystem maybe.

That's a great way to put it in ecosystem.

And beyond just the price, the depth and the type of analytics

offered, that also varies significantly based on who the

system is designed for. OK.

Like what kind of differences? Some systems might focus heavily

on just the core physical metrics, distance, speed

sprints. Others get into more

sophisticated stuff like detailed workload calculations,

trying to correlate physical output with physiological

stress, or offering really deep tactical analysis features.

And you see specific features that are clearly tailored,

right? Like for different user needs

right? Absolutely.

You might see things like community leaderboards or

gamified performance scores. Those probably resonate more

with individual players, maybe younger athletes looking for

that engagement factor. Yeah, the front aspect.

Whereas things like expert design training, training plans

integrated into the app, or sophisticated real time data

dashboards for coaches, those are aimed squarely at more

serious athletes or team staff. This segmentation is really

crucial then because it means you listening to this.

You really need to pause and think about what actually

matters most for your situation. 100% you have to ask yourself,

what's my budget, not just for the initial purchase, but what

can I afford over the next year, maybe two years?

Good point, the long term cost. And how serious are you about

tracking? Is it just casual interest

seeing your basic numbers or are you really committed to using

this data for a long term improvement?

And what features do you actually need?

Exactly what specific metrics or features are going to be

valuable and, importantly, actionable for you or your team?

There's no point paying for features you'll never use.

That self-assessment really is Step 1, isn't it?

Are you tracking for fun? For serious personal growth?

Team analysis? Maybe even trying to get noticed

by scouts. Your goal really dictates the

kind of data and features you should be looking for.

Precisely. So let's start unpacking the

first system we looked at in detail.

That's Soccer B and specifically their POO 2 and Late 2 models.

OK, Soccer B And that philosophy you said was about making data

accessible? Yeah, their stated core

philosophy is to democratize data to make GPS tracking

accessible to everyone. I really like that framing,

democratizing data. It feels like they're focused

on, you know, empowering the individual athlete, putting the

power of these performance insights right into their hands.

That seems to be the core idea, and they do mention having a

global community of over 50,000 athletes using their system,

which is, well, pretty significant. 50,000 yeah, that's

a decent user base, just it resonates with people.

That community aspect is definitely part of their appeal.

I think fostering those shared experiences maybe some friendly

competition or motivation. OK, So what about the tech

Soccer BPR, O2? What are the specs like?

Right. The pod itself, the actual

tracker, it's small and light, only 38g, and the dimensions are

about 60 by 41 by 18 millimeters.

Tiny easily fits into that vest pocket without you noticing it

too much I imagine. Should do.

Yeah. It uses GNSS technology for

location tracking. GNSS.

OK, what does that mean practically?

So GNSS stands for Global Navigation Satellite System.

Essentially, it means the device isn't just relying on the

American GPS satellites, it's likely also using other systems

like the Russian G Lonas system simultaneously.

OK. So it's talking to more

satellites up there. Exactly, and typically using

multiple satellite constellations like that gives

you a more reliable and potentially more accurate fix on

your location compared to using just GPS alone, especially in

environments where the view of the sky might be partially

blocked, like near tall buildings or dense tree cover.

OK, good to know. More satellites equals

potentially better tracking makes sense.

Now, a really standout feature specifically for the Pro 2 model

is its battery life. Oh yeah, what are we talking?

An impressive 14 hours of recording time on a single

charge. 14 hours? Wow.

Okay, that is substantial. For most players, that's easily

multiple training sessions, probably several games before

you even need to think about plugging it in.

It offers significant convenience, no doubt about it,

less charging hassle. It can also store data

internally for up to seven games, they say, before you

absolutely need to sync it to the app.

That's handy too. Don't have to sync immediately

after every single session. Right.

And the set itself. What you get in the box is the

tracker pod, the vest to put it in, and a standard USBC cable

for charging. Pretty straightforward.

OK. And the Lite 2 you mentioned,

that's positioned as the more budget friendly option.

Correct. Lite 2 is their entry level

model. It shares the core GNSS tracking

functionality with the Pro 2, so you're still getting that

fundamental location data, but it likely lacks some of the more

advanced features. We know for sure it doesn't have

the replay feature, which we'll talk about for the PRO model,

but the kick contents are similar.

You get the tracker, the vest, the charging cable and it uses

Bluetooth to transfer the data to your phone app.

Got it. What about the vest itself?

What's the quality like? The feel?

The vest is made from a blend, 87% polyester and 13% spandex.

Standard sportswear stuff. Yeah, it sounds familiar.

It's designed to be lightweight, flexible, breathable, all the

things you want next to your skin when you're running around,

and it has that specific pocket on the back to hold the tracker

securely. Which is the standard placement

for these types of trackers. Keeps it centered and out of the

way. Exactly.

Care instructions mention hand wash only and no dryer, which is

typical for these kinds of technical fabric.

Good to know and user feedback generally positive on the vest.

Generally, yes. Reports suggest the fit and

comfort during play are pretty good for most people.

OK, cool. Let's dive into the metrics

then. This is what it's all about,

right? What kind of performance data do

you actually get from soccer? So both the PR O2 and the Light

2 cover the fundamental metrics you'd expect.

Things like total distance covered during your session or

game. The classic one.

How far did I run? The classic Yeah, your top speed

reached then distance covered while running at high speed.

That's usually defined as running faster than a certain

speed threshold, like maybe 19 or 20 kilometers per hour.

OK, so not just total distance, but how much of it was fast

running? Exactly.

It also counts the number of sprints you made, again based on

hitting a certain speed for a minimum duration.

And finally, your activity range shown as heat maps on the app.

The heat map so you can see where on the field you were most

active, where you spent your time.

Precisely. These are really foundational

metrics for understanding your movement patterns and your

overall physical output during a session.

How far, how fast, and where. Gotcha, Basic but essential

stuff. Does Soccer B offer anything

beyond those core metrics? They do include some metrics

that seem unique to their system.

One interesting one is they provide a total score based on

required performance levels for each position.

OK, how does that work? It sounds like they're trying to

add positional context, suggesting that the physical

demands and performance benchmarks are different

depending on whether you're playing, say, as a defender, a

midfielder, or a forward, and they score your performance

relative to those positional expectations.

Quite clever, actually. Yeah, recognizing that a

defender's good game looks different physically than a

striker's. It adds a layer of

interpretation and the Lite 2 model specifically mentions

tracking agile movements, which is a nice feature to see on the

entry level option focusing on change of direction perhaps.

And the Pro 2 has that exclusive replay feature you mentioned

that sounds like it's more than just looking at numbers it.

Is yeah. The replay feature takes your

GPS data points from the session and visually reconstructs your

movement path on a representation of the field

within the app. Oh cool, like watching a little

animation of yourself running around.

Kind of, yeah. It's incredibly useful for

visual tactical analysis. You can literally see where you

were positioned relative to well, if other teammates are

using it where they were. You can review your runs off the

ball, your defensive positioning.

I can see the value there for understanding positioning and

decision making. Exactly.

It helps you better understand your spatial awareness and

movement throughout the game Or the training drill.

It basically turns the raw location data into a visual

story you can learn from. Seeing is believing I guess.

Not just the numbers but the actual movement path.

OK, what about the software side?

The app experience. So the main app is called Soccer

B, and it's available on both iOS and Android.

People report that syncing the data from the tracker after a

session is pretty quick, usually around 1:00 to 2:00 minutes via

Bluetooth. That's not bad at all.

And the app itself has a range of features seemingly designed

to really engage the user, not just dump data on them.

OK, like what? What stands out in the app?

Well, you get trend graphs. These let you analyze your

performance over time, tracking key metrics month by month, or

maybe across a whole season, so you can actually see if you're

improving in specific areas like your Sprint count or high speed

running distance. Tracking progress over time?

Yeah, that's motivating. Definitely.

There are also leaderboards for global comparisons if you're

into that sort of thing, and match comparisons which let you

see how your stats stack up against teammates or maybe

opponents who are also using soccer be in the same game.

The comparison aspect that can be a big motivator to seeing how

you measure up. Absolutely, and they lean into

some fun, almost gamified features as well.

One is the player card. Player card like in a video

game. Kind of it presents your

performance data and that positional score we talked about

in a format that looks a bit like a player card from FIFA or

Football Manager. Makes your data feel more

engaging maybe? I can see the appeal, especially

for younger players. Yeah, and they're also kudos

badges. Users can apparently earn these

or give them to others for displaying certain skills or

attributes during a game. Things like vision, technique,

teamwork. So getting feedback or

acknowledging aspects of play that go beyond just the raw

physical data, that's interesting.

It's a neat way to incorporate more qualitative aspects, Yeah,

they're leaning into the community and social side pretty

heavily with things like that. Seems like it, yeah.

What else is in the app? They also have something called

the SCB Performance Index. This actually links your

physical data from the tracker to self reported metrics.

Things like how long you slept the night before or how fatigued

you feel on a given day. Well, that's smart, connecting

the dots between lifestyle and performance.

Exactly. It's valuable because it helps

you start to understand the connection between in your on

field performance and your off field recovery and well-being.

The app might offer some insights or guidelines based on

this, like suggesting when you might be ready for a high

intensity session versus needing more rest.

Getting into readiness and recovery, that's pretty advanced

for an accessible system. It's a nice touch and for pure

gamification. Just for fun, there's apparently

a virtual market value feature which fluctuates based on how

your performance compares within the wider Soccer B community.

OK, so they're really mixing serious data with some playful

engagement features. It's quite a unique blend.

It seems to be yeah, trying to cater to both the data-driven

player and someone looking for a bit more fun and community

interaction. They also have something for

teams you mentioned. Yes, that's called SCB team.

It's essentially an administrative module or

platform for coaches. It allows a coach to easily

aggregate and view the performance data for all the

players on their team who are using Soccer B devices.

So making it practical for team level analysis and tracking

progress across the squad. Exactly streamlines it for the

coach instead of them having to look at everyone's individual

accounts. User reviews generally describe

the app, both individual and team sides, as pretty intuitive

and easy to navigate. So the overall workflow sounds

very user friendly, especially for individuals.

Put on the vest with the tracker, go play, then sync it

to the app afterwards. Simple.

Precisely designed to be straightforward for the end

user. And as we touched on earlier,

maybe the biggest differentiator for Soccer B is the pricing

model. Yes, this is a really key point

for a lot of potential users I imagine.

So what are the numbers? The Soccer B Pro 2 set is priced

at $179 USD. The Late 2 set is $139 USD.

Okay, 179 and 139. And the most significant

advantage here, the thing that really sets them apart from many

competitors, especially those with the pro heritage is that

these are one time purchases. There are absolutely and no

ongoing subscription fees required to access your data or

use the core features of the app.

Wow, OK, that's huge. Buy it once, own it, use it

indefinitely without extra cost popping up every year.

That's the value proposition. Very straightforward.

You know exactly what your total cost is upfront.

That's definitely appealing, especially for players on a

budget or those who just don't like subscriptions.

What are the limitations though? No system is perfect.

True, like most systems that relies solely on GPS for

positioning, indoor use is a significant limitation.

Right, we talked about that GPS signals don't work well indoors.

Exactly, accuracy is heavily degraded inside buildings, so

think stadiums with roofs, dedicated indoor arenas, even

sometimes under really heavy tree cover can cause issues

because the satellite signals get blocked or reflected.

So bottom line. If you play a lot of futsal or

train primarily in an indoor facility, this type of GPS

tracker might not give you reliable data.

Correct. You really need a clear,

unobstructed view of the sky for best performance.

Also regarding weather resistance, while the device

itself is sweat resistant, which is good for playing in heavy

rain or if you're a particularly heavy sweater, they actually

recommend using a separate waterproof pack.

It costs about $8. An $8 add on for waterproofing?

Why is that separate? Presumably to keep the main unit

cost down, but also maybe because full waterproofing adds

bulk or effects breathability. They advise using the pack to

prevent moisture getting inside the pod or causing condensation

damage, which could affect the electronics.

OK, so something to bear in mind, if you regularly play in

wet conditions, you might need that extra little purchase.

Worth factoring in. All right, let's try and sum up

the main pros and cons for Soccer B based on everything

we've discussed. Sure.

On the positive side, the affordability is a huge plus.

With that one time purchase model and 0 subscription fees,

that's probably the biggest draw.

Yeah, hard to beat that long term cost.

The Pro 2 model offers truly excellent battery life at 14

hours. They also make a point of

emphasizing individual data ownership, putting you firmly in

control of your performance information.

That's important to some people. Definitely, and they provide a

pretty comprehensive set of core metrics for the price point.

Plus, the app seems engaging with those community and

gamification features we mentioned.

OK. Sounds like a strong value

proposition, yeah. What about the downsides?

The cons? The main cons stem from the

reliance on GPS, so limited accuracy or functionality for

indoor use is the big one. Non starter for indoor players.

Pretty much you also need to purchase that optional

waterproof pack if you want Peace of Mind and really wet

conditions. Naturally, the Leap 2 has fewer

features than the Pro 2, so there's a trade off there for

the lower price. And FIFA approval.

Right. Explicit FIFA approval wasn't

highlighted for these specific consumer models in the materials

we looked at. Now, whether that matters to an

individual amateur player is another question, but it's

something that other systems do have.

OK, so putting it all together, who does Soccer B seem perfect

for? Well, that one time price, the

focus on individual ownership, the gamification.

It really seems designed for, say, the budget conscious

player, maybe younger athletes who respond well to the app

style, or just someone who wants to track their basic performance

and progress without committing to a recurring annual expense.

It sounds like a fantastic entry point into the world of

performance tracking, doesn't break the bank, gives you the

core data, and has some fun features.

Exactly, the gamified elements like the player card or virtual

market value could be particularly motivating for

users who enjoy that kind of competitive or game like

mechanic, and the data ownership piece is a strong philosophical

message for individuals. And that SCB team module that

also makes it potentially attractive for smaller clubs or

maybe school teams, right? Potentially yes.

It offers a model where the team could use the central platform

to aggregate data, but the cost burden of the hardware falls on

the individual players buying their own devices.

That could be more manageable financially for some teams

compared to buying a set of subscription based units for the

whole squad. So it presents a clear trade

off. Then you get accessibility, low

long term cost, great battery life on the Pro.

In exchange for perhaps slightly less advanced metrics compared

to some higher end systems, the indoor limitation and lacking

that formal FIFA certification that you know some more serious

players or teams might look. For But for many, many players,

that certification might not be necessary at all.

They just want to know how they did.

Absolutely. It depends entirely on your

context and goals. And when choosing between the PR

O2 and the Elite 2, it really boils down to a simple question.

Is that extra $40 worth it for the visual replay feature and

that significantly longer 14 hour battery life on the PR O2?

Precisely. You have to weigh how much you

value those specific upgrades based on how you train, how

often you play, and how deep you want your analysis to go.

OK, that's a really clear picture of soccer B.

Let's shift gears now and look at our second system, Catapult

One. Now, this one comes from a

company with A well, a really deep history and elite level

sports performance. Well, absolutely.

Catacult is a major, major player in the professional

sports technology world. They've been around for over 15

years and their tech is trusted by, get this, over 4400 elite

teams across loads of different sports worldwide, including some

of the biggest soccer clubs you can name. 4400 teams.

Wow. OK.

So they definitely have pedigree.

They do, and Catapult 1 is their products specifically designed

to bring that expertise, that pro level monitoring they call

it, down to the level of amateur athletes and teams.

Their tagline captures it right. Trusted by the pros, designed

for you. They often list examples of

famous teams using their tech, really driving home that

connection to the elite game. That heritage, that link to the

pros, it's absolutely central to their brand identity and the

credibility they bring to the performance tracking space.

People see the name Catacult and associate it with the highest

level. So what about the tech inside

Catapult One? What makes it tick?

Looking at the technical specs for the Catapult One pod, a key

feature they highlight is its use of 10 Hertz G technology. 10

Hertz G OK. You mentioned GNS for Saggerby.

How is 10 Hertz different? Can you break that down?

Yeah, sure. So standard consumer GPS devices

like maybe in your phone or a basic watch, often record your

position at 1 Hertz. That means they update your

location just once every second. OK, 1-2 second. 10 Hertz, as the

name suggests, means the device is updating its position 10

times every single second. 10 times.

Wow. OK.

That's a much higher frequency. It is, and that much higher

sampling rate allows it to capture rapid changes in

movement. Think quick accelerations,

decelerations, sharp turns with much greater precision than A1

Hertz device could. I see because soccer is full of

those stop start explosive movements.

Exactly. Catapult claims this allows them

to detect up to 12150 distinct movements per second, which

sounds incredibly high but reflects the sensitivity and

achieve accuracy down to the nearest 100 centimeters or 1m.

OK. So potentially very accurate

tracking of those dynamic moves. That's the goal.

The pod also incorporates an accelerometer.

An accelerometer like in your phone for step counting.

Similar technology, yeah. An accelerometer measures

acceleration, specifically how quickly your speed is changing,

both speeding up positive acceleration and slowing down

negative acceleration or deceleration.

So the 10 Hertz GPS for precise location and the accelerometer

for measuring how quickly you change speed.

Putting those together gives a really detailed picture of your

movement. That's the idea.

It's crucial for understanding the highly dynamic nature of

soccer movement, which isn't just about steady running speed.

It's about those bursts, those checks, those turns.

Makes sense. What about battery life for the

Catapult One pod? We heard Soccer B Pro 2 had 14

hours. Yeah, Catapult 1 battery life is

different. They stayed.

It's around 4.5 to 5 hours of active use, so roughly 270

minutes. 4 1/2 to five hours? OK, that's significantly shorter

than the soccer BPR O2. That might cover 1 long game or

maybe 2 shorter training sessions.

Depending on the length, yeah, it's definitely less active time

per charge. However, it can apparently last

up to two months on standby if you're not using it, and it

recharges in about two hours using its included wireless

charging dock. Wireless charging.

OK, so shorter active battery life, but maybe more convenience

when it comes to charging. Just chop it on the dock.

That seems to be the tradeoff. They've gone for a clear

difference in charging philosophy and battery

management compared to soccer Bees, USBC and Long Life.

Interesting. What about data storage?

Storage capacity is quite large, reportedly up to 600 hours of

activity data, which they equate to 4GB, so plenty of space.

More than enough, yeah. The pod also has little

indicator lights to show its status, whether it's charging,

syncing data, or, importantly, whether it has successfully

locked onto the GPS satellites before you start your session.

That's useful knowing you've got a good signal lock and the pod

itself. Size.

Weight. It's described as small and

lightweight. The overall kit, including the

pod, vest and charger, weighs about half a kilogram, so the

pod itself is quite minimal. Okay, what about the vest that

comes with Catapult One? How does it compare?

The vest is made from what they describe as a four way flex

ultra compressive fabric. Ultra compressive, sounds tight.

Yeah, Catapult describes it as durable and comfortable,

providing a very secure fit for the pod, which sits in an

ergonomic pocket on the back, similar to Soccer B.

Any specific user feedback on that vest you mentioned?

Soccer B's was generally well liked.

User reviews for the Catapult 1 vests are also generally

positive, finding it comfortable enough for play.

However, some specific comments did note that it can feel very

compressive, almost like a sports bra, which might not

appeal to everyone. And a few users mentioned they

found it potentially less breathable than some other

sports vests they'd worn, maybe leading to more sweat retention

underneath it. Just something to be aware of,

individual preferences vary. Good to know.

Let's get to the crucial part again, the performance metrics.

What kind of data do you get with Catapult One?

What are they tracking? They tend to focus on what they

call 10 core metrics derived from that 10 Hertz GPS and

accelerometer data. OK, what are the core 10?

They include the basics we've discussed, total distance,

Sprint distance, distance covered above a Sprint

threshold, and top speed. The fundamentals.

Right. But they also track power,

likely related to accelerations and intensity.

They track player load, which is a big one for them, and overall

intensity along with the standard heat maps showing where

you moved. OK.

Player load, you said that's a key metric for catapult.

What exactly is it measuring? Player Load is a proprietary

algorithm developed by Catapult over years of working with pro

teams. It aims to quantify the total

physical stress or workload your body experienced during the

session. It's not just about distance.

It takes into account the frequency and magnitude of

accelerations, decelerations, maybe even changes of direction

and impacts measured by the accelerometer.

Oh OK, so it's trying to give you a single number that

represents how hard your body actually worked considering all

those dynamic movements, not just how far you jogged.

Precisely. It's designed to be a much more

refined and sensitive measure of cumulative workload than just

looking at distance or speed alone.

It captures the intensity of the effort better.

That sounds really valuable for managing training and recovery,

knowing your true load. It is, and Catapult actually

highlights the potential for improvement using their system.

They report findings suggesting that players using Catapult 1

consistently for about 3 months showed on average a 12% increase

in total distance covered per session.

OK. 12% more distance. And quite impressively, a 26%

average increase in Sprint distance covered.

Wow, a 26% jump in Sprint distance in just three months?

That's significant. It really underscores how using

objective data like player load perhaps can directly inform your

training and potentially Dr. really tangible physical games.

It really does. It shows the power of

understanding precisely where you're at physically identifying

weaknesses, maybe in your sprinting capacity, and then

being able to target your training effectively based on

real data, not just feel. That's compelling evidence for

data-driven training. OK, what about the software

experience, The Catapult One app?

Right, the app. It's available for both iOS and

Android. As you'd expect, data syncing

happens via Bluetooth from the pod to the mobile app.

There's also an option to sync via USB connection to a laptop,

which would be particularly useful for coaches managing team

data. OK.

What features does the Catapult One app offer that really stand

out? What makes it different?

The app seems pretty comprehensive, really.

Leveraging that pro background, you can easily track your

performance trends over time, just like with Soccer B,

benchmarking yourself against your personal bests for the

different metrics they track. Standard progress tracking.

Yes, but a really significant feature drawing directly on

Catapult's heritage and vast database from working with pros

is the ability to compare your performance data not just

against the wider Catapult One community, but also against

anonymized data from professional players.

Compare yourself to actual pros. Oh whoa, that must be incredibly

motivating. Or maybe intimidating.

It could be both, but it provides those aspirational

benchmarks seeing how your Sprint distance or player loads

stacks up against someone playing at the elite level.

Of course, the comparisons to other amateur users in the

community are probably more useful for setting realistic,

achievable goals day-to-day. True, seeing how you compare to

peers is often more actionable. What else is in the app?

A big value add and something that connects to the

subscription model is access to a content library.

Content like articles. More than that, it includes

structured training plans designed by top level coaches

drawing on Catapult's expertise, plus expert advice on related

areas like nutrition strategies and recovery techniques.

Ah, OK. So it's not just giving you the

raw numbers from your session, it's actively roviding guidance

on how to train smarter based on that data, how to recover

better, how to fuel yourself trying to help you actually

improve. Exactly.

It's a much more guided, holistic ecosystem approach.

They're trying to provide context and actionable advice

alongside the performance metrics.

That makes the subscription feel more like paying for a coaching

resource, not just data access. That seems to be the intent for

teams similar to Soccer B, there's a dedicated web

dashboard for coaches. This allows them to manage the

squad, analyze aggregated player data using catapults, more in

depth analytics and track team trends.

And the app allows for detailed breakdowns of sessions.

Yes, you can get quite granular. You can specify if the session

was 5 aside, 7 aside, or 11 aside, which might affect

expected outputs. You can choose to include or

exclude warm ups and cool downs from the main analysis if you

want to focus just on the intense parts useful.

You can also look at your performance broken down into 5

minute segments throughout the session, or compare your output

between the first half and the second-half of the game, for

example, to see if your performance drops off.

That level of detail is great for analysis.

Spotting fatigue maybe? Potentially, yeah.

User reviews of the app interface itself are generally

very positive. People use words like seamless,

slick, and easy to use. It seems well designed.

So it sounds like a really deep app experience, lots of

potential for detailed analysis, plus that guided content aspect.

How easy is the overall setup in the day-to-day workflow?

Setup is reported as being quick and straightforward.

The pod operation is typically very simple, often just a single

button press to start and stop recording a session.

Nice and easy, and the daily workflow is the standard you'd

expect. Put the vest and pod on go play,

take it off and sync the data to the app.

The wireless charging dock adds a layer of convenience there.

Just place the pod on the dock when you're done rather than

fiddling with the cable. OK.

Now let's get to the pricing. Again, this is the other major

point of difference compared to Sokobe's model.

Yes, and it's crucial to understand Catapult 1 operates

on a membership only model. You don't just buy the hardware

outright. Right, you buy the kit, the pod

vest charger, but it comes as part of an annual subscription.

Exactly. For individual players, the

price listed on their Australian site, for example, is $259.99

AUD per year. That price includes the starter

kit, pod vest, charger, and 12 months of access to the app, the

data analysis, the content library, everything.

OK, $259.99 AUD per year. Now the USD conversion might

fluctuate maybe around 170 a 180 USD currently, but that's just

illustrative. The key thing is that prices per

year, and it's a recurring annual cost.

That's the critical factor. Year 1, you pay that amount, you

get the kit, you get 12 months of access.

But year 2, if you want to keep using the system, keep accessing

your historical data, keep getting the content, you have to

pay that annual fee again. Just for the continued software

and service access as you already have the hardware from

year 1. That's correct, it's an ongoing

annual membership fee for teams. The pricing is structured

differently, usually quoted per player per year.

Around $180 USD per player annually was mentioned, often

with a 2 year commitment required.

That includes the kit for each player, access to the coach

dashboards, and the player app access.

So that recurring annual cost, whether individual or team

significantly impacts the total cost of ownership over say two

or three years compared to a system like Soccer B where you

just pay once upfront it. Absolutely does.

It's a fundamentally different financial commitment.

You're paying for ongoing service and value, not just a

one off hardware purchase. However, a major point in

Catapult 1's favor you mentioned is related to official

recognition. Yes, Catapult 1 is explicitly

FIFA authorized. OK, FIFA authorized.

Why is that important, especially for an amateur player

or maybe someone aspiring to play at a higher level?

What does that badge signify? It means the system, the

hardware and the data it produces has been independently

tested and verified to meet the strict quality, accuracy and

reliability standards set by FIFA for what they call

electronic performance tracking systems, or EPCS.

So FIFA has basically said yes, this device measures what it

claims to measure accurately and consistently according to our

standards. Essentially, yes, for players

who might be aiming for higher level leagues, academies or

college programs where certified technology is sometimes required

or at least preferred by coaches and scouts, or even just for

your own confidence in the data knowing it's been validated by

the sports official governing body add significant weight and

credibility. It ensures the metrics you're

tracking aligned with recognized competitive standards.

That's good to know. It adds a layer of trust in the

numbers you're seeing. OK, what about limitations for

Catapult One? We know about the battery life

difference. Right.

And like Soccer B, and fundamentally due to its

reliance on GPS, Catapult 1 explicitly states that it does

not work indoor. Same limitation, GPS signals

need a clear sky. Exactly.

Indoor environments block the satellite signals needed for

accurate tracking, so same caveat applies.

If you play primarily indoors, this isn't the right technology

for you. And the vest.

Just those user comments we mentioned earlier.

Some found it very compressive. Some noted breathability could

potentially be better compared to other options.

Minor points for some, may be more significant for others,

depending on preference. OK, let's try and summarize the

pros and cons for Catapult 1 then.

Right pros. Definitely the strong

credibility that comes from Catapult's professional heritage

and crucially, that FIFA authorization.

Big pluses for serious players. It offers a comprehensive set of

metrics including valuable workload data like player load

and power. The app provides a really robust

experience going beyond just data to offer valuable content,

those training plans, recovery advice and the unique

comparisons against professional player data.

The ecosystem idea again, yeah. Yes, there's a solid team option

with dedicated coach dashboards and the hardware itself,

particularly the 10 Hertz GPS sensor combined with the

accelerometer is quite advanced for the consumer market aiming

for high fidelity movement tracking.

OK, sounds impressive. What about the cons?

The main one is undoubtedly the subscription cost model.

This results in a significantly higher long term ownership cost

compared to a one time purchase system like Soccer B.

That's a major factor for many people's budgets.

The biggest hurdle? Potentially.

Agreed, the active battery life at 4.55 hours is considerably

shorter than the Soccer BPR O2 even with the wireless charge

and convenience. It is strictly limited to

outdoor use, which is a deal breaker for indoor players, and

there were those few user notes about the vests compressive feel

or potential breathability issues for some individuals.

So the analysis here seems to be that the subscription model

isn't just about paying for hardware overtime, it's about

buying into that continuous service, that whole ecosystem of

content support, pro comparisons and ongoing development that's

backed by Catapult's professional expertise.

Exactly. It's designed for players and

teams who are really serious about using data for long term

development, who value having access to expert resources, and

who want the validation of benchmarking against high

standards, including the pros and FIFA approval.

The recurring cost is positioned as paying for that continuous

stream of value. Catapult is essentially

leveraging its vast knowledge base from working with thousands

of professional teams and offering a slice of that

expertise to the amateur market through this subscription.

That's a good way to look at it, and while comparing yourself to

pros is definitely an exciting headline feature, the app's

ability to also provide realistic benchmarks based on

your own progress and comparisons within the wider

Catapultus One amateur community is likely where the most

actionable insights will come from day-to-day.

Makes sense. Keep it realistic.

So it's pro heritage and that FIFA approval make it a very

credible, very compelling option for serious amateur players,

aspiring professionals and structured teams who want a

system that aligns with higher level standards and offers that

deeper ecosystem of support. If the subscription cost fits

the budget and the goals, yes. All right, for our third deep

dive, we looked at a system called Fit Together.

Oh, Coach. Now, from everything we've

gathered, this is operating at completely front level, right?

This is the top tier of professional football

technology. It certainly is Foot Together OH

Coach is explicitly positioned and designed as a specialist

FIFA approved Electronic performance Tracking system.

You'll see the acronym EPTS used a lot at this level,

specifically for elite professional football clubs and

organizations. We're talking top leagues,

national teams that kind of level.

Exactly. This isn't something an

individual player, or even most amateur teams would

realistically be buying or using for themselves.

So straight off the bat it's not available for direct to consumer

purchase like Soccer B or Cannibal 1.

That's correct. It's fundamentally a

professional B to B, business to business solution.

They mentioned it's used by over 500 teams globally and they have

official partnerships like with the K League in South Korea.

OK. And it holds the highest

possible ratings in the FIFA Quality program.

Yes, for accuracy and consistency and significantly as

of late 2022, fight together achieved FIFA Preferred Provider

status specifically for live tracking.

FIFA preferred provider for live tracking.

Wow, that sounds like the absolute ultimate stamp of

approval, especially for accuracy and reliability during

a live match environment. It really is.

It signifies that their system, when used for collecting data in

real time, meets the absolute highest standard set by FIFA for

data quality, latency and reliability.

It's a very prestigious certification in the EPTS world.

So their whole technical setup, which is based on wearable GPS,

is laser focused on achieving that peak accuracy and

consistency, all independently validated by FIFA.

That's the primary goal at this level, accuracy and reliability

are paramount, and it's interesting to note their

partnership with another big name in tracking technology,

Connexon. Connexon Yeah, they're well

known for high precision tracking, especially indoors

sometimes, right. Yes, they do both GPS and local

positioning systems. In this case, their GPS

component is actually incorporated into the Connexon

Perform GPS Pro system, so they collaborate.

Footed Together provides the core GPS tech for Connexon

system. It appears so in that specific

product. And that Connexon system powered

by Foot Together's tech is specifically recognized for its

top ranked live player data quality and powerful cloud

processing capabilities. This combined system can

apparently provide over 120 live metrics during a training

session or match over 120 live metrics.

Yeah, OK. That just highlights the immense

power and sophistication of the underlying technology that Fit

Together has developed. Even if it's delivered through a

partner system in some cases, the level of detail is just

staggering. It really shows you the kind of

granular. Real time insight that's

possible and frankly expected at the elite level of sport.

So what kind of performance metrics are we talking about?

At this tier, beyond the basics, well, it covers the core

professional data points. With extreme precision, things

like player position on the pitch, speed, but also

incredibly intricate movement patterns, the nuances of

acceleration, deceleration, change of direction, maybe even

specific stride parameters. Getting really deep into the bio

mechanics of movement. Potentially, yeah, it can also.

Integrate physiological data, most commonly heart rate if the

players are wearing a compatible heart rate sensor alongside the

fit together tracking device. So the analytical focus here is.

Really geared towards what professional coaches and sports

scientists need, right? Things like managing player

fitness levels across a long season, evaluating endurance

capacity, and conducting really deep tactical analysis based on

precise positioning and movement data.

Exactly. It's providing the raw

materials. For sophisticated sports science

applications, the software reflects this.

There's the cloud based OH coach platform for overall data

evaluation, reporting and long term management.

OK and then for real time use during training or matches, they

have an iPad OS app called O coach live.

This is designed specifically for professional staff, coaches,

analysts to do things like design training drills digitally

compare the planned session goals versus the actual live

data coming in from the players, view a live dashboard with key

metrics and generate detailed post session reports quickly.

It really sounds like it's built for a dedicated.

Sports science department. Not something an individual

player would just fire up on their phone.

Absolutely. Data is collected using.

Their wearable devices, which they call OH Coach cells, and

the analytical structure within the platform is very detailed.

It's built around organizing data into activities like a full

training session or a match and then breaking those down into

sessions which could be smaller segments like just the warm up,

specific drills, the first half versus the second-half,

etcetera. This allows for incredibly deep

analysis of specific periods of play or training phases.

That level of segmentation is powerful.

For targeted analysis, what about ease of use in this

professional context? Again, it's about ease of use

for the professional. Staff who use it daily, systems

like this and the Kinex on partnership using Fit Together's

tech is a good example, are designed to optimize the

workflow for analysts and coaches.

The goal is to automate data collection and processing as

much as possible, reportedly saving significant time per

session, maybe 20-30 minutes compared to older or more manual

methods. Efficiency is key when you're

dealing with the whole squad's data every day makes sense and

pricing we already. Established it's not for

consumers, but what kind of model is it?

Generally, the pricing is explicitly stated as.

Negotiable and strictly business to business B to B.

There's also usually a negotiable minimum order

quantity, meaning teams aren't buying just one or two units,

they're purchasing a system for the whole squad or multiple

squads and accessing the platform as part of a larger

customized service agreement. Right, So emphatically not

available. For you or me to just buy

online, definitely not. OK.

So it's primary? Relevance then?

To our listener, the individual player, the amateur coach, the

parent is really as a benchmark, setting the standard precisely.

I think it's most. Important role in this

particular deep dive is serving as the gold standard.

Understanding that a system like feed Together, OH Coach exists,

that it achieves these top FIFA ratings, including preferred

provider status, and that it provides this incredible depth

of validated data. It gives you the ultimate

context for evaluating the more accessible consumer options.

It's the pinnacle. It's the peak of the.

Mountain against which systems like Soccer B and Catapult 1

which are accessible can be implicitly measured.

It shows what the underlying technology is truly capable of

when cost and complexity are the primary constraints.

Exactly. It shows you the potential.

Even if you can't access that specific system directly today.

Interestingly, if any other does make a point on their materials

about data must have an owner emphasizing linking the

collected data to a specific player, even within a team

system, which shows that even at this elite level, the concept of

the player's individual data profile is central.

That's good to see player centricity even in.

A team contact and while this is purely speculative.

Based only on that Connexon partnership example, it's not

impossible that some elements of FIT Together score high

accuracy. GNSS technology could eventually

trickle down or find their way into differently packaged,

perhaps scaled down service models in the future, maybe

through partnerships. But that's just looking ahead.

It's not the case for the OH Co system itself currently

understood. So let's try and summarize FIT.

Together's pros and cons, but keeping our target listener, the

non professional in mind. OK, pros it represents.

The absolute highest standard of data accuracy and analytical

depth currently available in the soccer tracking field.

This is backed by multiple top tier FIFA certifications,

including that prestigious Preferred Provider status for

live tracking. It's proven technology, trusted

and used by elite professional leagues and teams all around the

world. And it offers incredibly

powerful live data capabilities and sophisticated cloud

analytics designed specifically for professional sports

scientists and coaching staff. And the cons?

Remembering this isn't really. For our audience, the obvious

cons for our listener are straightforward.

It is simply not available for individual consumer purchase.

The pricing is B to B negotiated and likely substantial,

requiring the kind of investment only professional clubs or well

funded organizations would typically make and its

complexity, the depth of features.

It's all geared towards professional sports science

staff, not the average player looking for quick insights on

their phone, right. So the big take away here is

that those top. FIFA ratings.

FIFA Preferred Provider. These aren't just marketing

fluff. They signify that this system

has been rigorously and independently validated at the

absolute highest level for professional use, guaranteeing

accuracy and reliability. They mean something significant

in that world, yes. And that connects on partnership

is a. Good example of how specialized

tech providers collaborate in this industry to push the

boundaries combining strengths. So while you can't buy OH coach

yourself, its existence is important because it defines the

cutting edge, shows the ultimate capability of performance

tracking tech and soccer, and sets that high bar for the whole

industry. Well said.

It sets the standard everyone. Else is in some way aspiring

towards or being measured against.

OK, fantastic. We've gone deep into.

Soccer B's accessible approach, Catapult One's Pro Heritage

subscription model and fade together.

Oh Cos HEH, as the elite benchmark.

Now let's pull back a bit and put the two main accessible

options, Soccer B and Catapult One directly side by side.

Let's focus on some key factors to really highlight the

differences that matter most to you, the player.

Thinking about getting one of these?

Yeah, let's do it. A direct head to head

comparison. Should make the trade-offs

crystal clear. Where should we start?

Maybe data accuracy and the underlying GPS technology.

Good place. So soccer B uses GNSS.

That's combining GPS and GLNS satellites, and they emphasize

the importance of their vest design for getting good,

accurate data capture, right? Catapult one on the other hand.

Promotes it's 10 Hertz GPS combined with an accelerometer

that higher frequency is designed for better detection of

rapid movements and they claim accuracy down to 100

centimeters. Crucially, Catapult 1 is FIFA

authorized, providing that external validation, and the

company positions its data as best in class overall for this

market segment. User reviews generally seem to

support its accuracy for consumer level tracking needs

and fit together just as a reference point.

Has achieved those top tier FIFA ratings for accuracy and

consistency as a full professional EPTS system

including the preferred provider status.

So summarizing the accuracy picture for the.

Accessible options Feed together clearly represents the peak

standard based on independent Pro level validation.

Catapult One offers strong technical specs with its 10

Hertz sensor and accelerometer, plus the important credibility

boost of FIFA authorization, making it appealing for serious

players. Soccer B uses standard reliable

GNSS technology, which is perfectly suitable for general

performance tracking at its more accessible price point.

OK, accuracy covered. How about the depth of metrics

offered? What data do you actually get?

All right, let's break it down. Basic.

Locomotion metrics, things like total distance, speed including

top speed, Sprint counts, high speed, running distance, and

heat maps showing activity areas.

All the systems we looked at cover these fundamentals.

The basics are table stakes. Yeah.

Yeah. What?

About workload, that seemed like a key difference.

It is Catapult 1 and the Professional.

Feet together system both track player load, which is that more

sophisticated measure trying to capture total physical physical

stress. Capital One also specifically

tracks power output and overall intensity, and Soccer B, Soccer

B also tracks. Intensity, but.

Instead of player load, it offers that unique SCB

performance index. Remember that links the physical

data to yourself. Reported well-being metrics like

sleep and fatigue offering a different angle on assessing

your readiness or the context of your workload rather than just

calculating load from movement data alone.

Two different approaches to understanding load and

readiness. Interesting.

What about the metrics related to agility or those intricate

changes of direction? The Soccer B Lite 2 model

specifically. Mentioned tracking agile

movements, which is nice for an entry level device.

Catapult 1, using its accelerometer, tracks distinct

accelerations and decelerations feet together being the

professional system gets into analyzing intricate movement

patterns at a much deeper analytical level, likely looking

at things like turn speeds or micro movements, tactical

features beyond just the heat maps.

What helps you understand positioning?

All provide heat maps which give a good.

Visual Overview Soccer B stands out here with its calculated

positional score, comparing you to positional benchmarks and

exclusively on the PR O2 model. That visual replay feature where

you can watch your movement path, that's quite unique for

tactical review. Yeah, the replay seemed cool.

High Together's professional. Platform as you'd expect.

Includes detailed position analysis and features like

direction maps showing movement orientations.

Catapult One relies more on the core metrics and heat maps for

tactical insight and its consumer offering Physiological

data. Heart rate integration.

Only feet together explicitly mentioned.

The capability to integrate heart rate data and even then it

requires using a separate compatible heart rate sensor

paired with their system. The consumer models we focused

on, Soccer B and Catapult One, do not typically integrate heart

rate directly from their GPS pods.

You'd need a separate watch or strap for that.

OK. And comparing your data against.

Other people, both Soccer B and Catapult One allow.

You to compare your stats against teammates if they also

use the system and against their respective wider user

communities. That social comparison aspect is

there in both, but Catapult had an extra layer.

Yes, Catapult 1 has that unique. Selling point of offering

comparisons against anonymized data from professional players

leveraging their extensive database from the elite game.

Soccer B doesn't offer that pro comparison.

Got it. What about those other app?

Features we highlighted earlier, the ones that go beyond just

metrics. Soccer B really differentiates

itself. With its gamified elements,

remember the player card, the kudos badges, the virtual market

value and also that SCB index linking performance to self

reported well-being. It feels geared towards

engagement and a holistic view, right?

The fun factor and the Wellness connection.

Catapult One's unique app strengths.

Lie in its ecosystem of expert content, providing those

structured training plans, the recovery advice, nutrition tips,

and reinforcing its credibility with those compelling pro player

comparisons. It's more about guided

performance enhancement value add service model.

Exactly. And Five Together's platform

again. For context is all about

professional analytical tools, real time dashboards for

coaches, specific sessions, segmentation for deep dives,

sophisticated reporting for sports science staff, different

worlds, OK hardware, durability and vest.

Comfort any major differences there between the consumer

options soccer piece pod is primarily.

Plastic Construction Catapult 1 uses aluminum in its pod

construction, which might imply potentially greater robustness

or a more premium feel. Though both are designed to be

worn in protective vests, Fight Together's Pro Hardware is

obviously built for rugged, daily professional use, and the

vests themselves? Zuckerby's.

Polyester spandex blend. Vest generally gets good reviews

for fit and comfort. Catapult One's Four Way Flex

Ultra Compressive Fabric is described as durable and

providing a secure fit, but we did note those scattered user

comments about potentially feeling too compressive for

some, or maybe less breathable than they'd prefer.

Fight Together's vest would be professional grade optimized for

elite athlete use battery performance.

This was a huge. Point of difference A massive

difference between the two main consumer.

Options. Yeah, the soccer BPRO 2 is the

undisputed champion here for sheer active session duration.

That claimed 14 hours per charge is incredible and offers huge

convenience. It uses a standard USBC port for

charging 14 hours. Is multiple games easy?

Definitely Catapult One offers a much more.

Modest 4.5 to 5 hours of active use per charge.

However, it counters with the convenience of its wireless

charging dock. Just drop it on to charge.

So a clear choice there based on.

Priority if maximum time between charges is your absolute.

Must have soccer BPRO. Two wins by a landslide if the

convenience of just dropping it onto a wireless charger after

every session appeals more. Catapult One offers that, but

you'll be charging much more often.

That sums it up perfectly. And fee together.

'S battery life would simply be designed to reliably last

through professional training sessions and matches whatever

that duration requires. What about ease of setup and the

daily syncing? Workflow any major hassles with

either both Soccer B and Catapult One seem.

Designed for relatively easy setup and a simple day-to-day

user experience, Sokomi reports quick sync times of around 1:00

to 2:00 minutes via Bluetooth to the app.

That's pretty fast. Catapult 1 is also described.

As having a quick. Setup process, Simple single

button operation on the pod and a seamless app experience

according to users. It offers syncing via Bluetooth

to mobile or USB to laptop, so both seem pretty user friendly

on the. Setup and sync front.

It appears so and via together in the professional.

Context focuses on overall workflow efficiency and

automation for the team staff managing the data, leveraging

partnerships like the Connects on One to streamline things.

Now let's revisit probably the most.

Critical technical limitation for many potential buyers.

Indoor use capabilities. Yes, this needs to be

absolutely. Crystal clear based on the

information for the specific models we focused on Soccer B,

Puro 2, Soccer B, Lite 2 and Catapult One.

None of these GPS based systems work reliably indoors.

And just to hammer it home again, why not?

Because. They fundamentally rely on

receiving. Signals from navigation

satellites, GPS, Jillonas, et cetera, orbiting high above the

earth. Indoor environments like indoor

soccer arenas, Futzel halls, even stadiums with retractable

or permanent roofs, or sometimes just large buildings with poor

sky view effectively block these relatively weak satellite

signals from reaching the receiver in the tracker.

So no signal, no accurate position.

Simple as that. Pretty much the accuracy

degrades. Massively or you might get no

position fix at all. So if you train or play

primarily indoors, these particular systems are simply

not suitable for tracking your movement performance reliably.

This is a non negotiable technical limitation you have to

consider. It's a critical filtering factor

in your. Decision.

Don't buy one of these if you mostly play futsal.

Exactly. It's worth noting.

Again, that some other professional systems, including

different models from Catapult themselves, like their Vector

Pro system, do work indoors, but they use different technologies,

often local positioning systems LP's, which involves setting up

special beacons around the indoor playing area to

triangulate position instead of relying on satellites.

But those LP's systems are typically much more.

Complex and expensive, right? Definitely professional tier

stuff. Correct.

They are not features you'll find on these.

More accessible consumer focused GPS models like Catapult One or

Sucker B. OK, indoor limitation stressed

what? About water resistance, handling

rain or sweat. Soccer BS devices are rated as

sweat. Resistant, which covers normal

training conditions, but for playing an actual rain or if you

sweat very heavily, they recommend purchasing that

optional $8 waterproof pack for full protection against moisture

ingress so needs an extra accessory for.

Proper wet weather use seems so Catapult one on the other hand.

Appears quite robust in this regard.

It's aluminum construction might help, and we saw at least one

user report specifically mentioning using it successfully

in torrential rain without issues.

It seems designed to handle typical outdoor playing

conditions. That's good Peace of Mind for

playing outdoors and. Find together as professional

grade hardware. Would certainly be designed and

tested to withstand various weather conditions encountered

in elite football training in matches.

Water resistance would be a standard requirement.

OK. Let's talk pricing and more.

Importantly, total ownership cost over time.

Again, this is maybe the starkest contrast between the

two main options. It really is where the models

diverge. Fundamentally presenting very

different value propositions financially.

So let's laid out clearly Soccer B.

Pro 2 is a flat $179 USD. Light T2 is $139 USD.

That's it. One payment, correct?

And crucially, there is N. O ongoing subscription fee

required to use the device or access your data and the core

app features. So your cost for year one is

$179 or $139. Your cost for year 2 is 0.

Your total cost over 2 years is just that initial purchase

price. Very simple, very transparent

and obviously. Very cost effective in the long

run? Absolutely.

Now contrast that with Catapult 1.

'S model, right? It's structured as an annual

membership that. Includes the hardware in the

first year's payment exactly the individual annual price we saw.

Listed was $259.99 AUD. Now the USD equivalent

fluctuates maybe around 170 or $180 currently making the first

year cost look somewhat similar to the soccer BPR O2 initially,

but that's an annual fee. So your year one cost is at 259

dollars 999 UUD or 17180 USD, which gets you the kit and 12

months of access. But your U2 cost to keep using

the service, keep accessing your data, keep getting content

updates is another 200 and 5999 AUD.

So over 2 years, the total cost for Catapult?

One is roughly double the first year's cost, around $519.98 AUD

or approximately 300 and 43160 dollars USD over 2 years.

That's correct. That recurring annual.

Cost is the key difference. That dramatically increases the

total cost of ownership over time.

Compared to Soccer B's one time purchase model.

That's a massive difference. Makes the choice very dependent.

On budget tolerance for recurring fees versus upfront

cost, it absolutely does and Fight Together's pricing.

Just for completeness, is B to B negotiated based on team size

and needs and not relevant for this individual cost comparison?

OK, that pricing difference is stark.

Let's try. And pull out the absolute key

differentiators. Now the unique selling points

USPS for each system, summarizing what makes each one

stand out. Sounds good for soccer.

B. The core.

USPS are clearly #1 affordability driven by that one

time purchase with unknown subscription fees #2 the

emphasis on individual data ownership and accessibility,

democratized data #3 the engaging, somewhat gamified app

experience with its community focus, and #4 specifically for

the Pro 2 model that outstanding 14 hour battery life affordable,

no subscription data ownership. Fun app, great battery life on

Pro. Got it.

What about Catapult One's USPS? Catapult One's key

differentiators are number. One, it's strong pro heritage

and the credibility that brings significantly reinforced by

being FIFA approved #2. The comprehensive performance

ecosystem you buy into with the subscription, including expert

content, training, recovery data analysis tools and those

valuable comparisons to professional player data #3 the

advanced sensor technology for the consumer market. 10 Hertz

GPS plus accelerometer and #4 a solid well regarded team option

with coach dashboards. Pro credibility.

FIFA approved ecosystem. Content Advanced sensor, good

team option and Feet Together as the pro standard.

Feet Together's unique strengths are number.

One, achieving the absolute highest level of FIFA

certification, including preferred provider and

independently validated accuracy for elite use #2 it's proven use

and trust by top professional leagues and teams globally.

And #3 The sheer power of its live data capabilities and

advanced cloud analytics platform designed specifically

for professional sports science applications.

Highest certification accuracy Elite Pro.

Focus powerful live data analytics.

Perfect. OK, so the core decision.

Points for a potential buyer really crystallize when you look

at those differences side by side, don't they?

They really do. It forces you to weigh the.

Trade-offs is Soccer B's much lower long term?

Cost and amazing battery life more important to you than

catapult ones arguably deeper data insights, the pro level

comparisons, the FIFA approval stamp and that integrated

training content and does the value proposition of.

Catapults ongoing ecosystem, the content, the updates, the pro

linkage actually justify paying that recurrent annual

subscription cost for your specific goals and budget.

Exactly. And all the while remembering

that FIN together sets the ultimate performance standard

showing what's possible even if it's not directly accessible to

most of us. It provides that crucial context

for the compromises. Made in the consumer products.

So based on all this, incredibly.

Detailed information. How does you, the listener,

actually figure out which system, if any, is the right

choice? As you said, there's no single

best answer because it depends entirely on your specific

situation, your needs, your goals, what resources you have

exactly. But we can try to break down.

Who each option seems best suited for Drawing on the

analysis we've just done, let's try some tailored

recommendations. OK, let's start with the player.

Who is maybe most budget conscious?

Perhaps a young player just starting out with tracking, or

someone who plays recreationally and primarily wants the basic

metrics without getting locked into a recurring bill.

For that user profile, the recommendation would strongly.

Lean towards soccer B, either the leap two or the PR O2 model

and the reasoning The key reason is clearly the.

Lowest initial. Cost and critically, absolutely

no ongoing subscription fees. It provides all the essential

core metrics, distance, speed, sprints, heat map needed to get

started with performance tracking in a very accessible

and affordable way. The PR O2 adds significant value

with the much longer battery life and that unique replay

feature. If the slightly higher upfront

budget allows for it, it's a great entry point.

Makes perfect sense for the budget focused individual.

Now what about the flip side? The player who is really serious

about performance improvement, very data-driven, wants the

deepest possible insights from a consumer device and perhaps

appreciate some guidance alongside the raw numbers for

that type of user, Catapult one seems.

Like the stronger and more logical fit.

Why catapult for them? Because it's.

More extensive set of metrics. Including things like player

load and power, coupled with the in depth analysis tools within

the app, the ability to benchmark against professional

player data, and that access to expert training and recovery

content, it all adds up to a much more comprehensive

development tool. So you're investing in the data

and the guidance? Yes, you're essentially

investing in a full. Service an ecosystem designed to

help you train smarter and improve consistently over the

long term. And for the serious type of

player, the FIFA approval also adds a significant layer of

credibility and trust in the data they're using to drive

their training. OK, clear distinction there.

What about? For small teams or coaches who

want to implement data tracking but might not have a massive

budget like a pro club, this is an interesting one as both

soccer. B and Catapult One offer viable

team options but with different models.

Soccer B using its SCB 2 module could be very cost effective,

especially if the team adopts a model where players purchase

their own individual Soccer B units leveraging the low one

time cost and the team coach just uses the central module to

consolidate and view that data. So low cost to the team budget.

Itself potentially. Potentially, yes, shifting the

hardware cost. To individuals, Catapult one

team on the other hand, offers a very clear annual per player

cost structure that $180 USD player year.

This leverages their pro heritage with dedicated coach

bash boards and team analysis features.

The cost is higher and recurring for the team, but it might be

simpler administratively and provides that deeper analytical

framework. So the decision for a small

team? Likely.

Comes down to how they prefer to handle the payment structure.

Individual player purchase versus A-Team funded

subscription and which specific set of team level analysis

features offered by either platform is most important to

the coach Exactly two different ways to approach team.

Tracking on a budget? OK, now what about players who

are really. Aspiring to play professionally,

maybe they're in academies, high level amateur leagues, college

programs where showcasing performance data might be

important for scatting or reviews.

In this specific scenario, among the accessible.

Options we detailed for individuals, Catapult 1 emerges

as the most recommended choice and the key there is the FIFA.

Authorization that. Is the crucial differentiator

here. It provides that official stamp

of credibility and validation that is often important or even

required in higher level, more regulated playing environments.

Coaches and scouts are more likely to trust data from a FIFA

approved system. Makes sense.

The data carries more weight. Yes, plus the detailed matrix.

Catapult provides and the ability to compare against

professional benchmarks are also highly relevant for players who

are seriously aiming to bridge the gap to the next level.

While we know Feed Together's technology is what actual pro

teams predominantly use, Catapult 1 provides that vital,

accessible, certified option for the serious amateur or aspiring

pro player. The best available bridge for

individuals. Needing that validation.

Got it. And now let's reiterate the

absolute non negotiable scenario.

If indoor performance tracking is your primary requirement.

If you mostly play footshole or train indoors, this is critical.

So let's be blunt. If you play primarily footshole

indoor soccer, or do most of your training in indoor arenas,

then based on their reliance on GPS, none of these specific

models Soccer B Lite 2, Soccer B Piro 2 or catapult one are

suitable or recommended for reliably tracking your

performance because one last. Time they rely on satellite.

Signals that are blocked indoors rendering the tracking

inaccurate or non functional, full stop.

So if that's you, you need to look elsewhere.

Probably towards much more expensive professional systems

using different technologies like LP's.

Or maybe except that current consumer GPS tech just won't

meet your needs for indoor tracking.

Correct. This is a hard filter you.

Absolutely must apply when assessing your needs and

considering these devices. Don't waste your money if you

play indoors. OK, so this deep dive has

hopefully. Laid out a huge amount of

information on the landscape, the technologies, the features,

the cost, the pros, the cons. But ultimately, as we've said,

the most important step is your own honest self-assessment.

Absolutely. You need to sit down and think.

What metrics truly matter for my specific goals right now?

Am I just curious about distance or do I need detailed workload

and intensity? What's my realistic budget, both

upfront and potentially for ongoing cost?

Where do I primarily play? Outdoors, indoors, or a mix?

Is this just for my own personal tracking?

Or am I trying to get data for a team?

Do I just want the raw data dumped on my phone?

Or am I looking for that extra layer of guided content,

training plans and deeper analysis tools by asking

yourself these specific questions and.

Weighing your answers against the strengths, the features, the

pricing models and the limitations we've outlined for

each system today, you are now empowered to make the most

informed and tailored choice for your unique soccer journey and

performance tracking needs. This has been a really

fascinating journey into how. Technology is rapidly changing

the game, changing how we understand soccer performance.

The way these systems are making objective data accessible at

different levels is quite remarkable.

It really is from. Soccer B's focus on trying to

get it into everyone's hands to catapult one, bringing those pro

level insights and methodologies down to motivated individuals

and teams, and then Finn together constantly pushing the

boundaries of the absolute elite standard.

The market is definitely evolving to meet diverse needs

and it's truly empowering for players.

And coaches giving them tools they simply didn't have access

to just a decade or so ago. Completely.

It's changing how players. Understand their own bodies and

performance and how coaches can provide much more specific

evidence based guidance for development and the pace of

innovation in wearable sports technology just seems to be

accelerating, doesn't it? It really does.

You can see that trend of professional.

Grade tech slowly but surely influencing and scaling down

into more more accessible products for the wider market.

Definitely. So looking ahead, what does the

future hold? What's next for player tracking

technology in soccer? Where is this all going?

Oh good question. Well, based on current.

Trends. We can probably anticipate even

more sophisticated use of artificial intelligence.

AIAI in my GPS tracker. It could.

Mean moving beyond just reporting.

Data to providing more personalized insights and

recommendations. Imagine the system learning your

patterns and suggesting specific drills based on your weaknesses

or giving you more accurate predictions about fatigue levels

or even potential injury risk based on your load patterns.

Proactive guidance, not just reactive data.

Exactly. Maybe even automated.

Feedback or coaching tips derived from AI analyzing your

movement efficiency or tactical positioning compared to optimal

models. Catapult already mentions using

AI in their broader platforms, so that intelligence layer will

likely get deeper. That's exciting.

What else expect to see? Continued improvement.

In sensor fusion, that means combining the data streams from

multiple types of sensors. Not just GPS, but

accelerometers, gyroscopes for rotation, maybe integrated heart

rate monitors becoming more common, perhaps even pressure

sensors embedded in cleats, someday weaving together

multiple data points to. Paint an even richer, more

accurate. And more detailed picture of

performance. Integrating these different data

types could lead to even greater accuracy and basic metrics, but

also potentially unlock entirely new insights, perhaps related to

bio mechanics, kicking technique, or specific skill

execution. Getting even more granular.

And what about? That big limitation, we kept

hitting indoor tracking. That gap will likely be

addressed more. Effectively, in the consumer

market, eventually it's too big a limitation to ignore.

We should probably look out for hybrid technologies emerging.

Maybe systems that cleverly combined GPS for outdoor with

inertial sensors, accelerometers, gyros for more

accurate dead reckoning indoors, or perhaps more cost effective

Local positioning system. LP's solutions will become

viable for amateur teams or individuals, allowing accurate

tracking inside arenas. That's a space to watch.

Finally, a reliable option for the futsal.

Players hopefully and overarching all of this, I think

the. Trend is moving strongly towards

a more holistic view of the athlete.

Holistic. Yeah, meaning meaning the data

won't. Just be about physical.

Output on the field in isolation, it will increasingly

integrate with and provide context alongside other aspects

of the player's life and readiness.

Think recovery status derive from sleep tracking, nutrition

logging, maybe even indicators of mental readiness or stress

levels. Connecting the dots like soccer

B. 'S SCB index was hinting at

exactly, but likely becoming much.

More sophisticated and integrated across platforms, the

goal will be to provide a more complete 360° picture of the

athletes overall state, allowing for better optimization of

performance and more effective management of injury risk.

By considering all the contributing factors, that makes

a lot of sense understanding the whole.

Picture The technology is advancing incredibly.

Quickly. But the tech itself is only half

the equation. To truly leverage its power,

you, the player or coach, need to stay curious, be willing to

learn, and be prepared to adapt and integrate these new tools

into your routines. It's not magic.

You have to use it right? Precisely.

But used well. These systems offer immense

potential to enhance your performance, help you manage

your physical load to stay healthier, and fundamentally

deepen your understanding and appreciation of the beautiful

game you play. Which brings us back to the

listener. This raises a really important

question for you to consider as we wrap up.

What single insight or piece of information from this deep dive

stood out most to you, and perhaps more personally?

How could understanding your own objective performance data,

maybe through using one of these systems, potentially change the

way you approach your next training session or how you play

in your next game? Something to ponder as you move

forward from here. Thank you for bringing this

absolutely fascinating topic. Forward for a deep dive today

exploring these different systems.

Soccer B Catapult One Fit together really highlights the

incredible options now available and the undeniable power that

data is bringing to soccer at all levels.

It's been great digging into it, we hope.

This detailed breakdown helps you think about how performance

tracking might fit into your own journey in the sport, whatever

your level or ambitions may be. And remember, there's always

more to learn. And explore in this dynamic,

rapidly evolving world of sports, technology and

performance analysis. It's not standing still.

Never a dull moment. Keep digging deeper.

Until next time.

Soccer GPS Vests: A Detailed Technical Comparison

About this episode