The Science of Clutch Performance: Cracking the Code of Scanning, Rituals, and Elite Mental Training with Professor Geir Jordet

OK, picture this. The stadium roar is deafening.

Everyone, I mean everyone is watching you.

You're standing over the ball for a penalty shootout.

It's the most intense moment in sports, right?

Absolutely the ultimate pressure cooker.

And what makes the difference? Forget the physical skill for a

second. Why do some players nail it and

others just crumble? It's not the legs giving out,

it's the mind. Exactly.

That internal collapse. People used to just call it

choking, you know, vaguely. But now, thanks to this one guy,

Professor Gir Jordais, it's moving into actual science.

Jordais, the penalty guru. Well, yeah, he's kind of become

the world's expert on performance psychology.

Under extreme pressure he basically cracked the code.

He really did. And his work on penalties, which

everyone talks about that, that's just the entry point,

isn't it? It opens up this huge systematic

look at how elite performers think and see totally.

So our mission today is a real deep dive into his whole life's

work. We'll look at how he started

quantifying football intelligence, how he pinpointed

those escapist behaviors that wreck performance.

And then how he built the whole tech company.

Be your best to actually train these mental skills.

Exactly. We're basically unpacking the

formula for performing when everything's on the line,

whether that's the penalty spot or, you know, a massive

presentation at work. It's fascinating stuff.

Let's get into it. Where did it all start for him?

Academically, I mean. Right.

So his foundation is key. He started at the Norwegian

School of Sports Sciences, NIH. The big deal institution like

ranked 3rd globally in sports science research.

OK, so serious academic jocks from the get go.

Definitely. And he was sharp, got his PhD in

football and psychology back in 2004.

Youngest ever to do it there, apparently.

But the real driver for him, like you said, was this feeling

that something was missing in traditional sports psychology

research. What was the problem?

Well, most of the research, especially on things like vision

and perception, it was all done in labs.

You know simulations, right? Controlled environments.

Sterile. Exactly.

And Jodi felt that just didn't capture the the sheer chaos and,

importantly, the psychological pressure of a real live game.

Yeah, it's like studying bird flight by watching a bird hop in

a cage. You miss the wind, the

predators, everything. Good analogy.

So his big move was committing completely to field research,

actually studying players in the game.

His pH D was all about how players perceive things in these

dynamic, competitive team situations.

So how did the best players see the field better, process

faster, make the right calls under fire, that kind of thing?

Precisely, he argued. You could never truly replicate

the noise, the fatigue, the movement, the the mental weight

of it all in a lab. You have to watch it happen for

real. Makes total sense, but studying

general play midfield battles, That must be incredibly complex.

So many variables. Oh, absolutely.

Infinite variables, yeah. Which is why his strategic pivot

to focusing on penalty shootouts was, well, kind of brilliant.

The perfect natural experience. Exactly.

Think about it. High stakes?

Check. Isolated moment?

Check. Fewer variables?

Basically just the kicker and the peeper?

Check. Clear outcome goal or miss?

Check. It's a researcher's dream, in a

way. And he didn't just dip his toe

in, he went all in on the data. All in, he built this incredible

historical data set analyzing every single penalty shootout in

major tournaments going back to 1976.

Since 1976, that's a lot of penalty.

Over 700 kicks, coded and analyzed.

Just a massive, massive effort. Wow.

And that's what gave me authority.

By becoming the undisputed expert in this very specific,

quantifiable niche penalties, he earned the credibility.

Then top club started listening when he wanted to talk about his

broader ideas on vision and nonverbal stuff.

He solved the hardest puzzle first, basically.

Smart. OK, let's dive into those

penalty findings. The anxiety piece is central,

right? It's the killer app, so to

speak. Analyzing nearly 400 kicks, the

clearest finding was just how devastating anxiety.

Is and the stats really show it. Oh yeah.

Get this when a player steps up and missing means the team

instantly loses, their success rate drops below 60%. 60% that's

barely better than flipping a coin.

Exactly. But flip the script.

If scoring needs instant victory, the success rate jumps

to 92%. 92 That gap is enormous, and it's purely psychological.

Purely. Which leads us straight to

Jordan's big concept, escapist behaviors.

This is key for everyone, not just footballers.

OK, break that down. What are escapist behaviors?

They're basically suboptimal things you do automatically

because you just want this stressful situation to be over.

You're looking for immediate relief, even if the action

itself isn't the best one. So your brain screens Get Me Out

of here and you react too quickly.

Precisely the main behavioral evidence, he found was rushing.

How did he even measure that it happened so?

Fast video analysis frame by frame.

Sometimes he measured the exact time between the refs whistle,

the signal that starts the pressure clock, and the player

starting their run up. And the results.

Crystal clear players who rush, who take less than one second to

react, they only score about 58% of the time. 58 That's the

anxiety taking over. Yep, the players who take

control, who wait a second or more deliberately start their

routine, their success rate jumps to around 80%. 80% just by

taking a second, that's incredible.

It really is, and it shows the way forward for intervention.

You can't make the pressure disappear, but you can train

yourself to resist that urge to rush.

You create a routine, a ritual to stay in control.

But hang on, if waiting is so clearly better, why don't

coaches just tell everyone to wait like 5 seconds?

Is there a downside to waiting too long?

Overthinking it. That's a great point.

And yeah, there's definitely a balance.

You don't want paralysis by analysis either.

The research points to finding that sweet spot.

Waiting one or two seconds seems to be enough to engage the

thinking part of your brain, the prefrontal cortex, right, and

override that panic reaction from the limic system.

It's about regaining control of the process, shifting focus from

will I score to OK. Here's my routine.

That makes sense. It's about control, not just

delay. OK, so his research went beyond

just the individual kicker to. Oh yeah, he looked at the social

dynamics, because a shootout isn't just one guy, it's a team

thing. He looked at emotional

contagion. Emotional contagion?

How does that work? Well, he found that when the

score is tied, how a player celebrates a successful penalty,

it really matters. Get this, 82% of players who

celebrate with real strong positive emotion end up on the

winning team. 82% just from celebrating.

It seems so. That big celebration sends a

powerful signal, boosts your own teams morale, maybe puts a bit

of doubt in the opposition. It's like a ripple effect of

confidence. Wow, that's fascinating.

And then there was the finding about star players, the status

burden. I thought the big names would be

the most reliable. You'd think so, wouldn't you?

But your dad found the opposite. Players who were current status,

you know, recently won big awards, blonde or winners, that

kind of thing. They actually scored less often

than future status players, the rising Stars.

Really. Why?

The theory is that extra layer of scrutiny, the immense wheat

of expectation, the potential damage to their superstar

reputation if they miss it, all adds up to this extra

psychological burden that the emerging player doesn't carry

quite as much. So being the biggest star can

actually be a disadvantage in that specific moment.

Wild. OK, so from the pressure cooker

of penalties, he then pivoted to the dynamic chaos of open play.

Right? Trying to quantify football

intelligence. Exactly, and this is where his

core IP really lies. Now the science of scanning.

OK, let's define that precisely because people use that term

loosely. What's Jordate's definition?

His definition is very specific active head movement where a

player's face is temporarily directed away from the ball to

gather information in preparation for subsequently

engaging with the ball. Right.

So it's deliberate head movement away from the ball to see what's

going on. Precisely.

It sounds simple, but it's the key outward sign of a player's

situational awareness. It's the first step in that

cognitive loop. Search, decide, execute.

If you don't search effectively, your decision is going to be

based on incomplete or old information.

And he actually managed to measure this to quantify that

vision people always talk about. He did.

Using meticulous video analysis, again often frame by frame, he

found a clear positive correlation between how often a

player scan before they receive the ball and how well they

performed next. Better pass completion, more

chances created, fewer mistakes. So more scanning equals better

play essentially. That's the correlation, yes.

It provided the first real objective measure for what

people intuitively called football intelligence.

The classic example everyone uses is Javi Hernandez.

The Barcelona legend, Yeah. His scanning rate was off the

charts average, something like .83 scans per second in the

moments before getting the ball. 0.83 per second.

That's almost constant head movement.

Compared to a typical forward who might be less than .3 scans

per second, it showed that the best players aren't just

physically quicker, their brains are processing the game faster

because they're constantly updating their mental map.

OK. And this led him to develop

specific metrics to measure standing right, the things his

company now uses. Exactly.

He broke it down into measurable subcomponents.

Let's list them. What's the first one?

The most basic is scan rate. Simple enough?

How many times do you scan per second in that crucial 10 second

window before you receive the ball?

Higher rate generally means more awareness updates.

OK, scan rate, what's next? Then it gets more nuance with

scan timing. It's not just how often, but

when are you scanning at the right moments, Like scanning all

the ball is traveling towards you, or crucially, scanning

between touches when you're dribbling.

Scanning while dribbling must be harder, requires more mental

juggling. Much harder.

You're doing a complex motor skill controlling the ball and a

complex perceptual task. Looking around simultaneously,

it shows cognitive stability under pressure.

The best layers don't let controlling the ball suck up all

their processing power. Got it.

Scan rate, scan timing, Yeah. What else?

Then there's what Jordi considers maybe the most

advanced skill the critical scan.

The critical scan. What makes it critical?

It's the very last look a player takes as the ball is actually

moving towards them just before they receive it.

It's the final update. It ensures their decision is

based on the absolute latest information, not what the pitch

looked like two or three seconds ago.

So it reflects truly up to the second awareness.

Exactly. And beyond that, he also looks

at awareness. How well does the player seem to

retain and use the information they gathered?

And finally, decision making, evaluating the quality of their

action with the ball based on the scanning data.

Did they pick the best option given what they saw or should

have seen? OK.

So the big take away here, the So what is that?

Scanning isn't just correlation, it's seen as a leading

indicator. Better scanning leads to better

decisions. That's the core idea.

More scanning provides fresher, richer information which

logically leads to quicker, more accurate decisions.

Train the looking, improve the playing.

OK, but this is where we need to bring in the academic scrutiny,

right? Because as revolutionary as this

sounds, it hasn't gone unchallenged in the scientific

community. Absolutely essential point.

His work is hugely influential, especially in applied settings,

but academic reviewers, particularly of his popular book

Pressure, raised some important methodological questions.

It's this classic tension between the public expert and

the rigorous academic. What were the main criticisms?

The biggest one revolves around that correlation versus

causation issue we touched on. Showing that players who scan

more also pass better is one thing.

Claiming the scanning causes the better passing is a bigger leap,

statistically speaking. Why is it such a leap in this

context? Well, critics point to

potentially oversimplified statistical analysis.

They worry about omitted variable bias.

Right, the idea that maybe some other factor is responsible for

both the scanning and the good performance.

Exactly. Think about it, players who scan

a lot might just be inherently better athletes overall, right?

Maybe they're faster, fitter, have better innate spatial

awareness. Anyway, is it the scanning that

makes them good? Or are they good players who

also happen to scan a lot? It's really hard to untangle

those things in the real world without a proper randomized

experiment, which is almost impossible in elite sport.

Like that Diet Pill analogy you mentioned earlier, giving it to

healthy young people and comparing them to older sick

people. The pill might look effective,

but the underlying differences are the real story.

Precisely. Critics also noted that some

studies had relatively small numbers of observations, making

it harder to draw strong causal conclusions using just simple

correlations. They prefer more complex

statistical models to try and isolate the effect of scanning

itself. And this tension kind of peaked

with that claim about Lionel Messi being a below average

penalty taker, didn't it? That made waves.

It really did. Great headline generator, but

statisticians looked at the actual numbers, factored in

standard deviation and statistical significance, and

concluded Messi's record wasn't statistically different from the

average. So the claim was maybe

stretching the data for impact. That's what the critics argued,

that it was framed sensationally to sell much more than a

rigorous analysis. It works for public engagement,

definitely, but it can rub the scientific community the wrong

way if it feels like oversimplification.

It's a tough line to walk, isn't it?

You need the academic rigor, but you also need to make it

understandable and compelling for coaches, players, the

public. A very fine line.

Which is why, to be fair, Jordan himself is careful.

In his academic writing and even in his book, he explicitly

states that many of the findings show correlations, not

necessarily causation, and that interpretations about the

underlying cognitive mechanisms are speculative.

So he acknowledges the limitations.

He does. He manages to bridge that gap,

present compelling, actionable insights for the real world

while acknowledging the academic nuances.

That's quite if he'd in itself. OK, so that bridges us nicely

into the application side. How did he translate all this

research into practical consulting?

Right, because theory is one thing, practice is another.

He became a highly sought after applied performance psychology

consultant. His core message is simple but

powerful. Yeah, you can't eliminate

pressure, but you can handle it better.

And his framework for that involves those three key ideas,

yes. Ritual, agency and resolution.

Let's focus on ritual first, because that seems to directly

address the escapist behaviors from the penalty research.

Exactly rituals about creating a deliberate, consistent pre

performance routine. When the pressure hits and your

thinking brain starts to go offline, you fall back on this

automatic practice sequence. So it gives you something to

focus on, something you can control.

Precisely. That's the agency part.

You reclaim control by focusing on your process, your ritual,

not the outcome you're worried about.

It helps ensure you execute consistently, even when you're

feeling panicked, resolutions about how you process the

outcome afterwards, good or bad, to learn and move on

effectively. That philosophy must resonate

hugely with elite teams. His client list is basically a

who's who of top football clubs. Absolutely.

Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, AX, Bayern Munich, they've all

worked with him. And what does that work involve?

Is it just talks? No, it's much deeper.

It's providing insights on handling pressure, analyzing non

verbal cues within the team, running tailored courses for

players, and crucially, educating the coaches on how to

spot and manage these psychological factors.

Teaching the coaches to be psychologists on the touchline.

Almost. In a way, yes, giving them the

tools. But what's really striking is

how universal these principles are.

It's not just football. Right.

You mentioned other sports. Yeah, he's applied the same

methodology with top NBA and NHL teams.

Think about basketball and hockey.

Incredibly fast-paced, high pressure, constant decision

making. The principles transfer

directly. And even beyond sports into the

business world. Definitely he consults for major

corporations Microsoft, Canon, Shell, PwC and notably Skagen

funds and investment firm. Ah, the fund manager connection.

That seems like a perfect fit. It's a brilliant analogy, isn't

it? A trader on a busy floor faces

information overload. Huge financial, financial

stakes, intense scrutiny. It's very much like a penalty

shootout environment. They need their own rituals to

avoid making impulsive emotional decisions when the market's

going crazy. Exactly avoiding their own

version of escapist behavior like panic selling or buying

based on fear instead of their strategy.

The underlying psychology of performing under pressure is

remarkably consistent across domains.

OK, so all this research, all this consulting, it naturally

led to trying to scale it, right?

Which brings us to his company. Exactly.

In 2015 he Co founded Be Your Best, based in Oslo.

And the goal was to take this knowledge global.

Pretty much to revolutionize training, shifting the focus

toward cognitive and mental skills, not just physical ones.

Jordan's the founder and chief researcher, keeping the science

at the core. But he needed business expertise

too, right? He partnered with Odds Garheim

as Co founder and chairman. Skarheim founded Atenci, a big

player in 3D gamified simulations for corporate

training. So you have the deep science

meeting proven commercial scaling know how.

A powerful combination and their vision.

To become the gold standard for cognitive and mental

improvement. Yeah, basically to create a

whole new category of training focused on the brain.

So what's the actual product? What did they build?

It's based around VR, right? Yes, it's a tech platform

available on VR headsets, but also laptops.

It directly commercializes those scanning metrics we talked

about. OK, let's breakdown the

components. What's the first part?

Component one is match play scenarios.

This uses VR to put the player right inside realistic game

situations, not just watching, but being there.

Simulating what exactly? Those high pressure moment.

Yes, receiving a pass under pressure in the box, needing to

scan quickly before the ball arrives, making split second

decisions with defenders closing in all those critical moments.

And the big advantage is training the mind without tiring

the body. That's a huge benefit,

especially for players bring from injury.

They can keep their decision making sharp, keep their visual

processing tuned even when they can't physically train.

It bridges that gap. Makes sense.

What's component 2? That's the companion app.

It's the mobile piece that syncs with the training platform.

What does the app do? It's the dashboard, basically.

Players and coaches can track progress, see personalized

analytics on their cognitive performance, how's their scan

rate improving, are they making better decisions?

And there are leaderboards for a bit of gamification friendly

competition. Keeps them engaged and component

3. This is the core tech, right?

This is the secret sauce, the scanning and metrics proprietary

technology. This is where Jordat's years of

research become functional software.

So it actively tracks those metrics we discussed earlier.

Exactly. It measures and logs the player

scan rate, assesses their scan timing that they look at the

optimal moment, identifies the critical scan effectiveness,

checks their awareness, and evaluates their decision making

quality based on what they saw or should have seen.

It turns vision from a vague concept into hard data you can

train. OK, so the science is solid, the

tech sounds impressive, but what's the market reality?

Is it taking off? Well, they're in what they call

a challenging commercial phase. They're using a mix of B to B

selling to clubs and B to C selling subscriptions directly

to players, with a focus now on building that recurring B to C

revenue. Have they secured funding?

Yes, they raised $2,000,000 in a Series A round, so investors see

the potential, but the big hurdle honestly is the VR

hardware. Yeah, still expensive and a bit

clunky for the average person or even amateur.

Club. Exactly.

It's a significant barrier to mass adoption, which is why

they're currently looking for a new CEO with strong digital

marketing and B to C experience, someone who can figure out how

to overcome that distribution challenge.

Makes sense. Are there competitors in this

space using VR for sports training?

Oh yeah, definitely. Companies like Rezil,

Neurotrekker, they also use VR and AI, and they also claim to

be backed by science. So what makes Be Your Best

different? How do they stand out?

Their edge is that direct, documented link to Professor

Jordi's peer reviewed research. They can point to specific

published studies that validate their focus on quantifying

scanning behavior. It gives them a layer of

scientific credibility that's arguably deeper and more

specific than some competitors. That transparency helps.

Let's look at another case study of the Research in Action

nonverbal communication. You mentioned he studied

thousands of signals. Incredible numbers.

He estimates a single match involves 2000 to 3000 body

language signals between players. 2 to 3000 Wow.

And his team actually coded 18,000 signals from the 2022

World Cup. They split them into tactical

signals, pointing, instructing teammates and emotional signals.

Frustration. Clapping, shoulder slumps.

What do they find? Tactical signals were more

common earlier in games, but his fatigue set in later in matches.

The emotional signals increase significantly.

It's like as mental energy drops, the emotional leakage

goes up. Interesting.

And these signals have an impact.

A big one. That ripple effect again.

Positive emotional displays can visibly lift a team while -1

slumped shoulders, visible frustration can deflate

teammates or even signal weakness to the opposition.

It highlights how coaches need to manage the emotional climate,

not just tactics. Fascinating.

And then there's the player endorsement.

Martin Edegard from Arsenal used it.

Yes, the Arsenal captain. He spoke publicly about using

the Be Your Best platform while he was injured, specifically to

work on his vision and decision making.

That's huge validation, isn't it?

Showing it's useful even at the absolute elite level, and

particularly when physical training is impossible.

Exactly, it proves the concept maintaining mental sharpness

when the body can't train. That's a massive value

proposition for any high level athlete or club.

OK, so looking ahead, where does Georgette take his research

next? What's the future for this

field? Well, one big area is AI

integration. Manually coding thousands of

signals or scans is incredibly labor intensive.

He's looking at how artificial intelligence can automate that

analysis of player behavior, both individual and team level.

Stuff that could unlock much richer, faster insights.

Makes sense streamlining the data collection?

What about expanding the scope? Definitely, he's already pushing

into women's football more formally, acknowledging its

growth and importance, and he's continuing to apply the

methodology to other sports. We know he's got active projects

and elite ice hockey and obviously continues consulting

with NBA and NHL teams. The principles keep proving

transferable. And for the company, Be your

best What's their ultimate ambition?

The big goal is to truly become that gold standard to create

this whole new category of cognitive training that becomes

as fundamental and expected as physical conditioning.

Targeting that massive global pool of players.

Exactly all 285,000,000 licensed football players worldwide, plus

athletes in other sports. But the real measure of success

beyond sales will be proving definitively that the skills

trained in VR translate to tangible, measurable

improvements on the actual pitch under real match pressure.

That's the final validation needed for mass adoption.

What a journey indeed we went from the intense psychology of

the penalty shootout. Through quantifying intelligence

with things like scan timing and the critical scan.

And landed on the tech Be your best trying to make these

crucial mental skills trainable for potentially millions.

And the core lesson seems to be that managing pressure isn't

about being tougher necessarily, but about being smarter, using

ritual to gain agency and fight those escapist behaviors.

Right, that deliberate, controlled process to stop

yourself from just reacting instinctively under stress.

So the knowledge is out there, the tech is developing, but the

final thought for everyone listening maybe isn't about

football at all. It's about your own life.

Right when you face your high stakes moment, that

presentation, that interview, that tough conversation, how do

you build your own stable and steady pre performance routine?

How do you stop yourself from rushing from reacting out of

anxiety? What does your critical scan

moment look like before you have to act?

Something to really think about learning to slow down, take that

extra 2nd and stay in control.

The Science of Clutch Performance: Cracking the Code of Scanning, Rituals, and Elite Mental Training with Professor Geir Jordet

About this episode