Sports Tech's African Ascent: GPS Trackers, Accessibility, and Real-World Impact

Welcome to the deep dive. Today we're jumping into a

really, really dynamic space. Player performance, tracking.

It's all part of this massive explosion in sports technology.

Globally, it really is. The numbers are pretty

staggering when you look at them.

Yeah. I mean, think about this.

The global market was valued at over 18 billion U.S. dollars

just last year in 2023. And the projections are just,

well, astronomical. Right.

Nearly 90 billion U.S. dollars by 2032.

That's some serious growth. And you know, a huge part of

that surge is the devices segment.

Exactly. Wearable performance trackers,

especially things like the GPS systems we're talking about

today, that segment alone, it's expected to hit something like

34.6 billion U.S. dollars by 2035.

Incredible. It shows you where the focus is

shifting, doesn't it? Towards data, towards

optimization. Totally.

So our mission to today, what we really want to unpack for you is

how this cutting edge wearable tech, these GPS trackers are

doing more than just collecting numbers.

Right, it's not just about, you know, how far someone ran.

No, it's about fundamentally changing how athletes train, how

they actually perform on the pitch, and maybe most

importantly, how we can prevent injuries.

And democratize access, too. That's a huge piece.

Yes, making these elite level insights the kind of stuff that

used to be only for the top, top pro teams, making that

accessible to more people. It's sort of levels the playing

field early, starts to giving aspiring athletes everywhere a

chance to benefit from the same kind of data analytics.

So our specific journey today will be a deep comparison of

three really prominent GPS tracker systems we've got fit

together player maker and all of our sports.

And we're not just going to, you know, list their features like a

product review. We're taking a critical look,

specifically focusing on how suitable they are for a very

particular market, a dynamic, exciting, rapidly evolving

market, Africa. Right, so it's tech meets

reality. Exactly.

It's understanding the innovation shore, but also how

it actually works or could work within unique economic

conditions, different infrastructure, the whole

picture. OK, so let's lay out the road

map for everyone listening. How are we going to tackle this?

Well, first we'll dissect the core technology behind each

system. Accuracy metrics, What makes

them tick? The nuts and bolts.

Precisely. Then we'll get into the nitty

gritty of pricing, the models they use, and what that means

for accessibility, especially in Africa.

Crucial point. Then what?

Marketing. How do they actually reach

athletes and teams? What's their strategy?

And most importantly. And most importantly, we

evaluate how they stack up against the specific challenges.

And let's not forget the incredible opportunities within

the African sports economy. So by the end, you, the listener

should have a really solid grasp of how these high tech solutions

fare when they meet the real world of emerging markets.

Absolutely. This deep dive, it's designed to

give you that shortcut to get you informed quickly but also

deeply. We want to spark those aha

moments. Yeah, not just facts, but

understanding the why. Exactly revealing the sort of

strategic implications, how innovation meets reality on the

ground, and what that genuinely means for athletes, for coaches,

for everyone involved in sports and emerging markets.

Knowledge you can actually use. Perfect.

Let's dive in. OK, let's kick things off.

But just appreciating the sheer scale here.

The global sports tech market is massive, and it's moving fast.

It really is. The growth trajectory is, well,

steep. We're talking a compound annual

growth rate, the CAGR of about 14.17% that's projected from

this year 2024 right through to 2032.

And what's fueling that? It's not just one thing.

No, definitely not. You've got major breakthroughs

in AI, artificial intelligence, and machine learning.

That's changing how data gets crunched and used everywhere in

sports. For sure.

And then there's all the innovation in smart stadiums,

right? Enhancing the fan experience.

Making operations smoother. Yeah, that's a big piece.

And of course you can't ignore E sports.

It's popular, is just soaring globally and that pulls the

whole tech sector along with it. True.

But for our focus today that devices segment the wearables,

that's a huge chunk of the pie. It is already valued at around

8.0 billion U.S. dollars this year 2024.

That tells you where a lot of the R&D, the investment, the

excitement is focused. It's on these performance

trackers. And what's fascinating really,

is seeing how the African sports tech market isn't just, you

know, watching this happen from the sideline.

You know they're actively involved.

Very actively, we're seeing a really rapid growing adoption of

these wearable performance trackers across the continent

and AI is being integrated more and more into coaching, into

training methods. So the tech is landing there.

Definitely. And the African sports economy

itself has serious scale. It's estimated at over 12

billion U.S. dollars right now. Wow, OK.

And the projections over 20 billion by 2035.

That's significant growth within the continent itself.

Absolutely, and it's driven by, you know, real factors on the

ground, more people participating in sports at all

levels from grass roots to elite.

You've got rising disposable incomes in many key regions,

which allows for more spending on sports and fitness and just a

general heightened interest continent wide in fitness and

health and outdoor activities. The passion for sport in Africa

is undeniable. Yeah, you can feel it.

But here's where it gets, like really interesting.

A bit of a paradox, almost. Despite this incredibly

promising outlook, this obvious growth within Africa, its

precise share of the global sports market, it's hard to pin

down. It remains largely unquantified.

The data gap issue. Exactly.

There's a significant data gap. You don't have the same kind of

granular, easily accessible market data that investors or

businesses might rely on in, say, Europe or North America.

Which creates a real challenge, right, If you're looking to

invest or expand? Totally this.

Data opacity is a barrier. Imagine trying to figure out

specific target segments or build data-driven strategies for

entering a market when you're missing some key pieces of the

map. It's like trying to navigate

without clear coordinates. You know the destination is

valuable, but finding the exact path is tricky.

And this brings up a really critical strategic question for

any company wanting to innovate or invest in Africa.

How do you actually do it then? Well, how do you conduct

thorough market sizing? How do you build robust entry

strategies when that detailed data is scarce?

Often it means you have to commit resources to primary

market research. Getting boots on the ground.

Exactly. Talking to people, gathering

qualitative insights, really understanding the local context

first hand. Or, and this is maybe even more

vital, you have to rely heavily on local partnerships.

People who know the landscape. Precisely, partnering with

individuals or organizations that have that deep regional

understanding, the established networks, the trust within the

community, it shifts the competitive advantage.

You know, it's less about just having those capital or the

fanciest algorithm and more about the ability to build those

strong local relationships. So it kind of levels the playing

field in a different way, giving an edge to those who really

invest in understanding the local reality.

You could see it that way. It rewards genuine engagement

and local expertise. So what does this all mean for

you? Listening whether you're an

entrepreneur, thinking about the space and investor or just

fascinated by sports future. It means understanding this

market growing dynamic, full of potential but also data scarce

is absolutely key. It's not just about having the

flashiest tech. Not at all.

It's about understanding the unique ecosystem, the specific

context where that tech needs to operate and succeed.

Success hinges on adaptability, on connection, on truly

understanding those local realities.

OK, now that we've kind of set the scene, painted the bigger

picture, let's zoom in and meet the actual players.

We're focusing on today three key companies in this GPS

tracking space. Right, each bringing a slightly

different approach, a different philosophy to the table.

We'll start with one known for precision, then look at an

innovator focus right on the foot, and finally a versatile

player aiming for broad accessibility.

Sounds like a plan. First up, feet together.

They hail from Seoul, South Korea, founded back in 2017.

And they've made quite a splash, secured significant funding,

$9.18 million in Series B. That's not small change.

No, that definitely signals strong investor confidence in

what they're doing. And they hold a really

prestigious position. Actually, Feet Together is

FIFA's preferred wearable provider.

Wow, FIFA's choice. Yep, and they've held that title

for five consecutive years. That's a serious endorsement.

Huge credibility marker. Absolutely.

Yeah. And their branding reflects

this. They position themselves not

just as selling a device, but as reresenting A mindset when

obsessed with precision, with clarity in football analytics.

So more than just hardware. Right.

Their main product is the Oh Coach Cell X4 and their target

market. It's very clearly the elite end

professional teams, top tier institutions like the Aspire

Academy and Qatar. OK.

So they're aiming high, high performance focus.

Exactly where those marginal gains at centimeter level data

really matters. Got it.

OK, Next up on our roster player maker.

Based in London, UK and they've also attracted some hefty

funding. How much are we talking?

Reported $50 million in their Series C round. 50 million.

OK, another serious player backed by significant capital.

Definitely and they've built a really impressive network of

partnerships, elite clubs like Fulham, Rangers over in

Scotland. National associations too.

Yeah, US Soccer Federation, the Scottish FA, they're embedded in

some key football ecosystems and they've got star power with

Harvey Elliott from Liverpool as a brand ambassador.

It helps get the name out. For sure, their core products

are these ultralight smart sensors that you actually wear

on your football boots, the Player Maker 2 Point O and the

City Play version. The city blue one.

It's the Manchester City Lane. Correct.

Exactly. It's a Co branding effort with

Man City offering exclusive club content insights through the

app. That's a massive draw,

especially for younger players. Smart Marketing.

Very and player makers whole aim their mission statement is about

democratizing access to this pro level data, making it available

not just to the pros, but to a much broader audience.

Who are they targeting specifically?

Youth players starting as young as eight years old all the way

up to ambitious individual players, amateurs, semi pros.

They want to bring those insights down the pyramid.

Interesting. From elite focus with Flip

Together to broader access with Player Maker.

OK, who's our third player? Our third is Oliver Sports,

founded in Barcelona, Spain, also in 2017.

Interestingly enough, same years fit together.

OK, Barcelona and their funding. They secured Series A funding of

around $869,000. Solid early stage investment

showing belief in their approach.

And what's their claim to fame? Any big partnerships?

Yes, they've gained significant validation through a partnership

with FC Barcelona. Their tech is used in the Bars

Academy and even at Lamazia. Lamazia.

That's legendary. And youth development.

Huge validation. Absolutely.

It speaks volumes. The product lineup includes the

OLIG PS: tracker, which is often worn in special cast leaves, and

a dedicated mobile app. Cast leaves OK, different

placement. Yeah, and they offer two main

solutions, Oliver Player for individuals and Oliver Pro

Tailored for teams. And how do they position

themselves? They call themselves a new

generation of sports tracker powered by AI.

Their core mission, much like Player Maker in a way, is about

democratizing access to elite sports tech globally.

OK, another one focused on wider access.

What makes them stand out? Their versatility is a big

point. Their tech isn't just for

outdoor 11. Aside football, they explicitly

mention its suitability for futsal, which is huge in many

parts of the world, and also for women's football.

Plus those flexible wearability options.

Calf sleeves or vests add to that adaptability.

Interesting footsole capability is a key differentiator.

Definitely, especially where GPS might struggle indoors.

All right, so we've met the players failed together, the

precision specialist player maker, the foot level innovator,

and Oliver Sports, the versatile Democratizer.

Now let's get into the tech itself.

This is where the real deep dive begins.

Let's do it. OK, this is the part I really

find fascinating. How do these things actually

work? What data are they spitting out?

Let's peel back the layers on the technology, the accuracy

claims, the metrics, and what makes each one unique.

Right, let's start with Fit Together and their OH Coach Cell

X4. Its rimary job, its core

function is incredibly recise measurement of where an athlete

is and how they're moving on the field.

Ositional data. Exactly.

Top tier ositional data. It catures a whole suite of

erformance metrics, things you expect like total distance

covered, top speed reached, the number and intensity of sprints.

Heat maps to showing where players spend their time.

Yep, heat maps are standard and it's also compatible with

external heart rate monitors like the polar OH One or H10 so

you can layer that physiological data on top.

OK, standard metrics, but the key is the precision, right?

That's the headline feature. Let's get into the tech behind

that. It uses an advanced GNSS Global

Navigation Satellite System, Not just GPS, but it pulls signals

from multiple constellations. GPS, Geelon, Ass, Galileo,

Baidu. More satellites means better

signal lock. Generally, yes, especially in

challenging environments. And it operates at a high

frequency, 10 Hertz, meaning 10 data points per second.

But here's the real kicker. The accuracy.

This is the centimeter level stuff.

We're talking 2 to 3 centimeters accuracy.

Think about that. Your phone GPS might get you

within two or three meters. This is orders of magnitude more

precise. How on earth did they do that?

OK, it's a fusion of technologies.

They use RTK Real Time Kinematic GNSS technology.

RTK uses a reference station, either a physical one nearby or

a virtual 1 via network corrections to cancel out

atmospheric distortions and other errors that limit standard

GPS accuracy. OK.

Like having a ground truth reference.

Essentially yes, but they combine that RTKGNSS with an IMU

in an inertial measurement. Unit What's in the IMU?

It's got a 3D accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a magnetometer.

These sensors capture movement, rotation, orientation, and they

sample data incredibly fast. At one kHz, it's 1000 times a

second. The refine output data comes at

100 Hertz. So the IMU fills in the gaps

between the satellite readings. It does more than fill gaps.

It provides incredibly rich data on micro movements, twists,

turns, jumps, impacts. The fusion algorithm

intelligently combined the precise location from RTKGNSS

with the detailed motion data from the IMU.

This allows for incredibly accurate tracking of even

complex dynamic movements. And that's why they consistently

top the FIFA accuracy tests. For five years running, yes.

That combination is state-of-the-art for positional

tracking in team sports. OK, what about the device

itself? The OH Coh cell X4.

It's pretty compact, about 45 by 76 by 18mm, weighs only 51g so

players barely notice it. Worn in those special vests

usually. Typically yes, that keeps it

stable and ositioned correctly on the uer back.

And it's IPX 6 waterproof, so sweat rain no problem.

And it provides real time data. Yes, that's another key feature.

It streams the data with almost 0 latency.

Coaches on the sideline can see live metrics, live positions,

allowing for immediate feedback and tactical adjustments during

a session or even a match if regulations allow.

No waiting to download after training.

You can download of course, but the real time capability is

powerful and it's all cloud powered.

No need for complex local server installations.

The workflow is efficient too. They claim under 90 seconds to

sync data wirelessly for a whole squad of 24 players.

Impressive. OK, let's shift gears to Player

Maker. They're Player Maker 2.0 and

City play. Different approach, right?

No GPS. Completely different approach,

no GPS at all. It's all about the sensors on

the boots. So what kind of data do they

capture? A lot, actually.

Over 25 technical and physical metrics.

On the technical side, it gets really granular because it's

right there on the foot. Things like kicking power, how

many times you possess the ball, your average time on the ball,

how quickly you release it. Even which part of the foot you

used? Yes, ball release fit zones also

turns with the ball total ball touches.

It's very focused on your interaction with the ball.

OK. And physical metrics.

Still captures key physical data.

Sprint distance, accelerations, decelerations, top speed.

Interestingly, both with and without the ball Work rate,

average speed when turning, total distance covered.

With and without the ball speed. That's interesting.

How? Because the sensors on the foot,

it can likely infer ball possession or interaction based

on the specific motion patterns and impacts detected.

And crucially, it gives you personalized skills scores.

Skills scores like in a video game.

Sort of scores across five key areas. 2 Footedness, How well

you use both feet, dribbling, first touch, agility and seed.

It tries to quantify your technical abilities.

How does it get all that without G just sensors on the boots?

It uses a six axis motion sensor system in each boot pod.

That's a gyroscope and an accelerometer similar to what's

in an IMU and the sample movement 1000 times per second

1000 hurt. So incredibly sensitive to

motion. Extremely.

It directly captures the micro movements of your feet, the

impacts when you strike the ball or plant your foot, the rotation

as you turn. It's analyzing the bio mechanics

of your movement directly. And FIFA is OK with this for

official matches. Yes, Player Maker holds the

distinction of being the only foot worn tracking device

currently accredited by FIFA for official play.

That's a significant stamp of approval.

What are the sensors like physically?

They're tiny and ultralight, just 6g each.

You barely feel them. They slot into these durable

silicone harnesses that wrap around the heel of your cleats,

designed for a snug fit so they don't move around.

And they work indoors too, obviously, since there's no GPS.

Exactly. Big advantage for indoor

training or futsal. The data flow is simple.

Sensors collect data during your session, then afterwards you

sync them via Bluetooth to the companion app on your phone.

And the app shows everything leaderboards.

Yep, immediate viewing of your stats, comparisons, leaderboards

if you're linked with teammates, and for the City Play version,

that's where you get the exclusive Manchester City

content, drills, tips from their coaches.

OK, sounds good. But you mentioned earlier mixed

reviews, sometimes reliability issues.

Yeah, we have to address that. While many users praise its

accuracy for technical metrics and find it durable, there are

consistent reports mentioning reliability problems.

Like what specifically? Things like sensors failing to

track a whole session, just losing data, frequent errors

popping up in the app, sometimes inconsistent connectivity for

syncing even indoors. Some users mentioned sensor

slipping or the app saying incorrect mounting even when

they seemed correctly placed that.

Could be frustrating. Definitely, And beyond user

anecdotes, some independent research studies have suggested

that player maker might underestimate total distance

covered and maximum speed compared to GPS systems.

Especially at higher speeds. That's what some studies

indicated, yes. The discrepancy and speed seemed

to increase the faster the player was moving.

So it's a trade off, isn't it? Seems like it.

You get incredibly unique, granular technical data right

from the foot. Data you likely can't get from a

GPS vest. But potentially at the cost of

some accuracy and overall distance and top speed metrics

and maybe some reliability hiccups for certain users.

That seems to be the picture, yes.

It excels in one area, potentially with limitations in

another. OK, depends what you prioritize.

Right. OK, let's move to our third

player, Oliver Sports, the OLIG. PS: Tracker and Oliver Pro.

What's their tech story hybrid approach?

Yes, they integrate both GPS and inertial sensors, aiming for a

versatile solution. They capture a really

comprehensive set of metrics. Break it down for us athletic

stuff first. Sure, you get activity time,

total distance, Max speed, sprints, accelerations,

decelerations, time spent jogging versus walking.

The standard athletic profile. And football specific.

This is where the cast placement becomes interesting.

They claim to provide heat maps, number of ball kicks, estimated

kick power and even ball possession time potentially

derived from analyzing the legs motion patterns captured by the

sensor on the calf. Kick power from a calf sensor?

That's ambitious. It is likely an estimation based

on acceleration and impact patterns, but perhaps most

significantly, they emphasize health metrics focused on injury

prevention. How so?

They monitor external load, the physical work done and estimate

internal load, the physiological stress.

From this they generate an injury risk index.

They claim their insights can help reduce injury rates by up

to 45% / a season. That's a massive claim if true.

Incredibly valuable. Hugely valuable, especially for

clubs managing player welfare. They explicitly say they

integrate GPS and sports science with AI to generate these

insights. And wearability cap sleeves

mainly, but vests too. The standard Oli tracker is

designed for the calf sleeves, but the Oliver Pro system for

teams offers versatility. It can be used in calf sleeves

or invests depending on the sport or preference.

And the indoor capability, you mentioned Fitzel earlier?

Yes, this is a crucial technological advantage.

Oliver uses its inertial sensors, the accelerometer, to

accurately track movement indoors where GPS signals are

weak or non existent. This makes it genuinely suitable

for indoor sports like Fritzl basketball or indoor training

sessions. So it overcomes that major GPS

limitation. How credible is their tech?

Any validation? They highlight their Co

development and validation work with major partners.

FC Barcelona is key to the Barsa Innovation Hub and La Mozia also

the MLS Innovation Lab in the US, and they're part of the FIFA

Innovation Program. OK, those are serious names.

Adds weight to their claims. Definitely lends credibility.

Talk about the app experience. What features does it offer?

The companion app for iOS and Android has rankings, challenges

to compete with others, performance insights,

personalized exercise recommendations based on your

data, historical tracking, and those interactive heat maps.

And the Oliver Pro platform for teams.

It's designed to be intuitive, heavily leveraging AI.

It offers automatic AI driven recommendations, quick custom

report generation and clear visual dashboards for coaches

and medical staff. Data download is also efficient,

45 to 90 seconds per player after a session.

OK, let's synthesize this tech deep dive, comparing accuracy

and reliability across the three.

Right. If we connect this back to the

bigger picture, you see that fundamental technological trade

off playing out fight together with its RTKGNSS absolutely

excels in positional accuracy, centimeter level precision.

That's gold for tactical analysis, understanding team

shape, spatial relationships on a large field where exactly

everyone is all the time. A macro view.

Exactly, Player Maker, being purely IMU based on the foot,

offers unique, incredibly granular biomechanical data.

How you kick, how you turn your footwork.

Fantastic for technical skill development, but as we

discussed, it seems to have limitations in measuring overall

distance and speed accurately, especially compared to GPS, and

some users report reliability issues.

The micro view with caveats. Precisely, and Oliver Sports

tries to bridge that gap. It uses a hybrid GPS plus IME

approach. It aims to give you good

positional data from GPS, though likely not RTK level precision

like venigator, and valuable movement insights from the

inertial sensor, plus that crucial indoor tracking

capability thanks to the IMU. It's aiming for versatility

across different needs and environments.

The versatile middle ground, maybe?

You could frame it that way, a balance solution for a broader

range of analytical needs, perhaps without hitting the

absolute peak of precision like Foot Together or the unique foot

level detail of Player Maker. So the take away here for you

the listener, is pretty clear, isn't it?

I think so. The best technology isn't a

universal little bowl. It really, truly depends on what

you need it for. Your specific use case dictates

the ideal solution. Are you a coach obsessed with

tactics and team formation? Fit together might be your

answer. Are you an individual player

grinding to improve your first touch and dribbling?

Maybe player makers? Technical data is key.

Or are you a multi sport athlete or someone training indoors and

outdoors needing a solid all around picture with injury

insights? All of our sports could be the

better fit. Your needs to find the best

tech. Fascinating stuff.

OK, understanding the tech is one thing, but even the most

amazing technology isn't much good if people can't actually

get their hands on it. So let's talk money.

Let's talk accessibility and pricing models.

Absolutely crucial, especially when we bring the African market

into focus later. Price is often a major deciding

factor. Right.

So let's start with Finn together again.

We established they're targeting the elite end.

Does their pricing reflect that? Oh, absolutely.

Explicit individual pricing isn't readily available because

they mainly sell to teams and institutions, but the estimated

costs are substantial. Give us a ballpark.

For a typical purchase set say 20 of the OH Co C sell X4 units,

the vests, the charging docks, software access support, you're

likely looking somewhere in the range of US $10,000 to US

$30,000. OK.

That's a serious investment for a team.

It is, and if they opt for a subscription model instead of an

outright purchase, estimates put that around US $10,000 to US

$20,000 per year. So definitely premium tier,

reinforces their focus on professional clubs, well funded

academies, national teams. Precisely, their pricing aligns

perfectly with their high performance target market and

there is significant investment in their EPTS electronic

performance tracking system. They do offer a free companion

app then Together Live, but that's really there to support

the main high cost hardware system.

Got it. OK.

How about Player Maker? They're aiming for broader

access. Does their pricing match that

goal? They have a very different

model. It's membership based.

You don't actually buy the device upfront.

Oh interesting, so you get the sensors for free?

Essentially yes, provided you subscribe to one of their plans.

OK, what are the plan options for individuals using Player

Maker 2 point O? They offer a few tiers.

There's a monthly plan at $20.00 per month, but, and this is key,

it comes with a 12 month minimum commitment.

So $240 for the first year paid monthly, right?

Then there's an annual plan paid upfront at $199 per year.

That saves you about $41.00 compared to the monthly route

over a year. OK.

And they push their 24 month plan as the best value.

That's $299 upfront for two years, which they say saves

$181.00 compared to paying monthly for two years.

Two years locked in though, What happens after the initial term?

This is important. All plans automatically renew.

The annual and 24 month plans renew at $149 per year after the

initial period, unless you actively cancel before the

renewal date. Auto renewal?

Good to know. Any guarantees?

They offer a 30 day money back guarantee if you're not

satisfied initially, and they provide a lifetime hardware

warranty, but only as long as you maintain an active

membership. If you stop paying, the warranty

likely stops too. And the city play version with

the Man City content, same pricing.

It offers a free one month trial which is attractive, but after

that it automatically converts to the $199 annual plan.

OK. One thing you mentioned earlier

was some user concern about pricing clarity.

Yeah, a few reviews noted that finding the exact subscription

costs and terms on their website wasn't always straightforward,

something potential customers should be aware of.

Read the fine print. Good advice.

OK. Finally, Oliver Sports, how do

they handle pricing? You said straightforward.

Yes, particularly for individual users.

Their model is very clear and contrasts sharply with player

Maker subscription. Oliver emphasizes lifetime

access with no ongoing monthly fees after the initial purchase.

The one time payment. Exactly.

For the Oli GPS tracker, it's currently 179 point or 299.

That's a single payment. OK, around 192 hundred U.S.

dollars depending on the exchange rate.

Roughly yes, and they do offer some flexibility.

You can also choose to pay through monthly installments of

1499 if the upfront cost is a barrier.

So an option to spread the cost, what's included for that price?

You get the Oli device itself, two of the cap sleeves needed to

wear it, and a charger. Everything to get started.

No hidden fees, no mandatory subscription to keep using it.

That's their main selling point for individuals.

Buy it once, use it forever with the core features now for teams

using the Oliver Pro system, the pricing is different.

How does that work? It's customized based on the

number of devices the team needs and the length of the contract.

They osition it as one of the most costeffective solutions for

teams, but there is a minimum purchase requirement, typically

15 devices for a one year contract.

Teams need to contact them for a specific quote.

OK. So still a significant outlay

for teams, but potentially more cost effective than Fate

together and the individual option is very different from

player maker. Precisely 3 very distinct models

now. Let's connect this directly to

the African market. This is where these different

models could have hugely different impacts, right?

Absolutely huge if we overlay these pricing structures onto

the economic realities we discussed earlier, the lower

average incomes in many African countries.

The expensive devices and especially high recurring fees

become a major hurdle. Exactly.

It makes systems like Fight Together, with its five figure

upfront for large annual costs, realistically accessible only to

the absolute top tier, the wealthiest professional clubs or

National Football associations on the continent.

So very limited reach potential there.

Very limited for widespread adoption.

Now compare the other two for individuals.

Player Maker subscription versus Oliver's one time purchase.

Think about a young player or their family in a region with

inconsistent income. Player makers, $20.00 a month

might seem low initially, but that recurring commitment,

especially the 12 month lock in, can be daunting.

What happens if income drops for a few months?

You might have to cancel, lose access, maybe even lose the

warranty on the device. Potentially, yes, It introduces

financial uncertainty. Now look at Oliver's €180 one

time payment. The higher barrier upfront, yes,

but once paid, it's done. You own the device, you have

lifetime access to the core functionality.

No more financial stress about monthly bills for that specific

tech. That predictability could be

much more appealing, much more viable for a larger segment of

the population. I would argue it is yes.

It removes the ongoing financial burden which aligns better with

context where disposable income might fluctuate or be limited.

The installment option also helps mitigate the upfront cost

barrier somewhat. And for teams, even all of our

pros, minimum 15 devices could be tough for grassroots clubs.

Definitely. While positioned as cost

effective compared to the very top end, that minimum purchase

still represents a significant investment that many smaller

clubs or academies, especially those relying on minimal budgets

or donations, would struggle to afford.

It still restricts access primarily to better funded

organizations. So the take away seems pretty

clear for widespread adoption in Africa.

I think so. Predictable manageable costs are

paramount. Ideally, A1 time payment option

like Oliver's for individuals has a much higher chance of

overcoming the financial barriers and achieving broader

success across diverse economic segments within the continent.

Subscription models, while lowering the initial hurdle,

carry that risk of long term affordability challenges.

OK, we've covered the tech. We've covered the price.

Now how do these companies actually get their message out?

How do they connect with the athletes, the coaches, the teams

they're trying to reach? And crucially for our deep dive,

what's their actual footprint in Africa right now?

Right, marketing strategy and real world presence are key

pieces of the puzzle. Let's look at fit together

first. The High precision Elite focused

1. Exactly.

Their marketing reflects that they undertook a complete brand

identity transformation recently, really leaning into

that mindset idea. Obsessed with precision, vision,

clarity, providing the ultimate analytical tool, they created a

unified logo system to project consistency and quality.

And they leverage that FIFA status heavily I assume.

Absolutely. Being the FIFA preferred

provider for five years is a massive credibility stamp and

they use it. Partnerships with elite

institutions like Aspire Academy also serve as powerful

endorsements. Their marketing is laser focused

on attracting those who demand the absolute highest level of

accuracy. Top pro teams, national squads,

High performance institutes. So less about broad consumer

appeal, more about B to B targeting at the highest level.

Precisely now, regarding their direct presence in Africa, the

information available is limited.

Their high end focus naturally suggests they'd target the

continents, top professional clubs and maybe some national

teams, those with the budget and infrastructure.

But maybe not actively pursuing grassroots or Academy markets

there? It seems less likely given their

positioning and pricing. Their approach appears very top

down. OK, what about player maker?

Their strategy seems different. Democratizing access.

Completely different. Their core message is all about

empowerment. Yeah.

Enabling players to measure, learn and improve.

It's very player centric. And targeting a wide age range.

Yes, explicitly targeting football players from age 8

upwards, plus their coaches and parents.

They even tailor the benefits communication for different

youth stages. U 9/11 focusing on foundational

skills. U12U14 on individual growth,

U18U23 on pathway progression. Smart segmentation and that Man

City connection must be huge for marketing.

Immense The City Play Co branding offers exclusive tips

and drills developed with Manchester City's methodology.

For any young player dreaming of playing like a City star, that's

an incredibly powerful draw. It adds aspirational value

beyond just the hardware. Now their presence in Africa,

you mentioned something specific earlier.

Yes, this is where Player Maker has a demonstrably tangible

footprint, particularly in South Africa.

Tell us more about that. Joe Mozono, a true legend of

South African football, a respected figure continent wide,

actually secured the distribution rights for player

maker across Africa. Wow, a local champion.

That's significant. Hugely significant and his

stated vision is crucial. He wants to make the technology

affordable and roll it out into youth leagues, recognizing the

financial pressures parents already face.

That shows a real understanding of the market.

Any examples of it in use? Yes, a concrete example,

Waterstone College in South Africa.

They became the first Academy or school there to adopt player

maker technology for over 100 of their players.

Over 100 players, so coaches there are getting that foot

level data for development. Exactly, it shows Player Maker

isn't just hypothetically available, it's being actively

used and integrated into local football development structures.

At least in South Africa. That's a strong beachhead.

Very interesting. OK, let's turn to all of cyber

sports. Their mission is also global

democratization. How does their marketing reflect

that? Their marketing is very much

rooted in that mission, positioning themselves as an AI

powered new generation tracker for all athletes worldwide.

They target a really broad audience.

Who specifically? Individual players, especially

young and aspiring ones, but also sports managers, coaches

and medical Staffs within clubs using their Oliver Pro system.

And key messages. They strongly emphasize

adaptability and inclusivity, highlighting its use for futsal

and women's football is a key differentiator, appealing too

often underserved segments. They also leverage those big

validation partnerships, FC Barcelona MLS Innovation Lab, to

build credibility and trust globally.

And their presence in Africa, you said they list many

countries for shipping. Yes, this is striking.

Their Oliver Pro system is reportedly used by over 200

teams and 45 plus countries, showing global reach.

But critically for Africa, their website explicitly lists dozens

of African nations as potential shipping destinations for their

individual Oli tracker. From Angola to Zimbabwe, you

said? Literally, it covers a huge

swath of the continent. This isn't just passive

availability, it signals a clear logistical readiness and an

active intention for broad market penetration across

Africa. They seem prepared to sell

directly to consumers across many different African

countries. That's a very different signal

compared to the others, more proactive global distribution.

It appears so, yes. A more direct to consumer,

globally minded approach from the outset.

So reflecting on this, what's the broader trend for GPS

tracking in Africa? Is it catching on beyond these

specific examples? The evidence suggests yes, it's

gaining traction, particularly within African football

academies. Layer Maker at Waterstone

College is one example. But the general trend seems to

be growing. Why?

What are academies seeing as the main benefits?

The value of real time data for immediate feedback.

The ability to personalize training programs based on

individual needs, optimizing player workloads to prevent

burnout, and crucially, that potential for injury prevention.

There's a growing awareness of how this tech can genuinely

improve player development and welfare.

OK. But for any company, these three

or others wanting to truly succeed and penetrate deeply

into the African market, what's essential?

Localization and partnerships are absolutely key.

It goes beyond just translating an app or website, so it's about

adapting the marketing message to resonate with local

aspirations. Addressing the specific training

challenges common in that region may be integrating with existing

local football structures or coaching education programs.

Building trust. Exactly, building genuine trust,

demonstrating a deep understanding of the local

context and meeting the market where it is A1 size fits all

imported approach is unlikely to achieve deep sustainable

penetration. Strong local partnerships like

Player Maker seems to have with Joe Mosono can be invaluable.

OK, this next part is absolutely critical to understanding the

real potential and the challenges.

We have to talk about the ground realities in Africa, the

economic landscape, the technology infrastructure, the

skills base, because the best tech in the world won't succeed

if the environment can't support it.

Couldn't agree more. These factors profoundly shape

adoption and long term viability.

We'll start with the economic factors, the income divide we

touched on earlier, right? Significant variations across

the continent, but many regions face low average incomes.

Yes, sub-saharan Africa's GDP per capita was estimated around

$50,506.00 in 2024. That context is crucial.

It means expensive devices, especially those with ongoing

service fees, are simply out of reach for a large portion of the

population and even for many smaller businesses or community

sports clubs. Even with the overall sports

economy growing. That's the disconnect.

While the overall sports economy is projected to grow

significantly, over $12 billion now, projected over $20 billion

by 2035, where does that money actually flow?

Often grassroots initiatives, the bedrock of player

development, receive a tiny fraction, sometimes less than

5%, of national sports budgets. So the big picture growth

doesn't necessarily translate into funding for equipment at

the local level where most players are.

Exactly. There's often a gap between

macro growth and micro level investment in essential tools

like performance trackers for developing players.

OK, economic reality is one piece.

What about Internet infrastructure?

The digital divide. This is another major hurdle.

Much of Africa, especially outside major urban centers,

struggles with underdeveloped digital infrastructure.

Access to reliable, affordable Internet connectivity is far

from universal. Do you have numbers on that?

As of 2022, estimates suggested only about 36% of Africa's

population had broadband Internet access.

And here's a striking figure. Even though 3G and 4G mobile

network coverage is quite high in many areas, only around 22%

of the population actually uses mobile Internet services

regularly. Why the gap between coverage and

usage? Affordability is a massive

factor. The cost of data is prohibitive

for many. In 2021, the average cost of

just one GB of mobile data was about 5% of the monthly gross

national income per capita in Africa. 5% of monthly income for

one GB. Yes.

Compare that to the UN's recommended affordability target

of 2%. It's more than double.

We see extremes like Equatorial Guinea where 1GB could cost

almost $50, while places like Malawi or Nigeria are much more

affordable, but still a significant cost for many.

And the cost of the phone itself.

That's another barrier. The median cost of just an entry

level Internet capable smartphone can be over 25% of

the monthly GDP per capita in some countries.

So both the device and the data plan are major expenses.

So for GPS trackers that rely on cloud syncing regular data

uploads, this unreliable and expensive connectivity is a

serious problem. A very serious problem.

It limits real time features and can make even basic data syncing

a challenge or an added cost for the user.

OK, Internet is shaky. What about basic electricity?

Power supply reliability is another significant challenge

across much of the continent. As of late 2019, estimates were

that less than half, only 43%, of Africans had a reliable

electricity supply. Less than half.

Yes, that means frequent, often unplanned power outages or

scheduled load shedding, where power is cut intentionally for

hours, sometimes even days, to manage grid strain.

South Africa struggles with load shedding are well documented,

reaching record levels in recent years.

What causes these power issues? It's often a combination of

factors. Aging infrastructure that hasn't

kept pace with demand. Insufficient power generation

capacity, sometimes mismanagement and even impacts

from climate change affecting hydropower, for instance.

And the consequences beyond inconvenience.

Significant economic consequences.

These power interruptions are estimated to cost nations across

sub-Saharan Africa between 1% and 5% of their GDP annually.

Wow. And for GPS trackers.

Think about it. You need power to charge the

devices. You need power for the routers

and computers used to sync and analyze the data.

If the power is out for hours every day, it's severely

disrupts the usability and workflow of these technologies.

A coach can't download data. An athlete can't charge their

tracker reliably. It undermines the whole system.

OK, so we have economic constraints, Internet

challenges, power issues. What about the human element?

Technical skills? That's the final piece of this

complex puzzle the technical skills gap.

Africa's rapidly growing tech industry faces a severe shortage

of skilled professionals, especially in advanced areas

like AI and data science that are relevant to these trackers.

Not enough people trained to use or support the tech.

Exactly. Well, the continent has a

growing number of developers, around 716,000 estimated.

The workforce isn't keeping pace with the skyrocketing demand for

digital skills. Businesses feel this acutely.

How so? Nearly 90% of African businesses

report that shortages in AI skills are causing project

delays, hindering innovation and even leading to lost clients.

This skills gap stifles startups and means market opportunities

are missed. And at the grassroots level,

education. This is worrying, yeah.

Estimates suggest a staggering 90% of African children leave

school without even basic digital skills.

This creates a huge challenge for adopting technologies that

require some level of digital literacy to operate effectively,

even just using the companion apps.

So putting it all together, low income, spotty Internet,

unreliable power, and a significant skills gap, that

paints A challenging picture for sophisticated tech adoption.

You create a complex multi layered barrier.

It means that simply taking AGPS tracker, designed for, say, a

top European club with perfect connectivity, stable power and

dedicated data analysts, and dropping into many African

contexts, well, it's just not going to work effectively

without significant adaptation. A1 size fits all approach is

doomed to fail. Almost certainly it demands a

much more thoughtful, localized strategy.

So the critical question then becomes how can companies

navigate this? How can they make their tech

work and deliver value in this environment?

The absolute number one need is for localized solutions.

Technology needs to be adaptable.

Adaptable how? It needs to function effectively

even with intermittent Internet connectivity.

Maybe it stores data locally on the device for extended periods

and only syncs when a stable connection is available, Perhaps

just once a day via Wi-Fi, rather than relying on constant

mobile data. Offline functionality is key.

OK. Resilience to connectivity

issues? What else?

Pricing models, as we discussed, need to be flexible and truly

affordable, strongly favoring one time payments over

subscriptions that create ongoing burdens.

And bridging the skills gap. Absolutely critical.

User interfaces need to be incredibly intuitive, requiring

minimal technical expertise. Setup processes must be

simplified. And crucially, companies need to

invest in accessible local Technical Support and training

programs, not just a helpline in another continent, but on the

ground support and education to empower users to actually use

the technology effectively. So it's about designing for the

context, not just in the context.

Precisely empowering users, making the technology resilient

and affordable within their reality.

That's the path to making a real impact.

All right. We've reached the combination of

our deep dive. We've looked at the tech, the

pricing, the marketing, the crucial on the ground realities

in Africa. Now the big question.

Considering everything we've unpacked, which of these three

systems 4 together, Player maker Oliver Sports appears to be the

best fit for the African market, broadly speaking.

OK, synthesizing all those factors, bearing in mind the

diversity within Africa itself, but looking for the broadest

potential fit, I'd have to say Oliver Sports emerges as the

probable frontrunner, particularly for wider

individual and grassroots adoption.

Why Oliver Sports specifically? Several key reasons.

Firstly, that pricing model for individuals the one time

purchase €179 with lifetime access or the manageable

installment option 14.99 month. This directly tackles the

affordability and recurring cost concerns that are so significant

in many African economies. It removes a major financial

barrier compared to subscription models or very high upfront

costs. So accessibility is #1 what

else? It's versatility.

The fact that it works effectively both indoors and

outdoors thanks to the IMU integration is huge.

And think about the variety of playing surfaces, the prevalence

of futsal or indoor training. That adaptability is a major

plus. Added applicability across

different sports, not just football and it's AI powered

insights, particularly the injury prevention focus offer

tangible value. And the validation from Bartha

helps credibility. Absolutely.

Plus, and this is a strong indicator of intent, their

explicit worldwide distribution capability listing dozens of

African countries for shipping, shows a clear readiness and plan

for broad market penetration on the continent.

They seem geared up for it. OK, so Oliver looks like a

strong contender for broad reach.

What about Player Maker? Where does it fit in?

Player Maker is definitely a strong contender, but perhaps in

a slightly different niche primarily focused on youth

development and structured team environments, especially where

local partnerships are strong. Why that specific focus?

Their tangible presence in South Africa, driven by the Jomo Sono

partnership and its adoption at Waterstone College, is

undeniable proof of concept within a local football

ecosystem that's powerful. And their focus on foot specific

technical data is incredibly valuable for skill development,

a major priority for youth academies everywhere you.

Have the limitation. The subscription model, despite

the free device upfront, remains a potential barrier for

widespread individual adoption outside of organized programs

where costs might be subsidized or absorbed by the institution.

And those reported inconsistencies in tracking or

reliability could also be a factor limiting broader

individual uptake if not fully resolved.

So strong potential, especially in structured youth settings,

but maybe less suited for mass individual market penetration

compared to Oliver's model. Got it.

And that leaves Fin together. Where do they fit in the African

context? A Fendtogether occupies a very

clear niche, the absolute elite level.

Top of the pyramid. Exactly, it's premium pricing

and its entire focus on achieving that FIFA ashtag 1

centimeter level GPS accuracy position.

It's squarely as a solution for high performance analysis.

It's best suited for the top professional clubs, the national

teams, the best funded high performance centers in Africa,

those entities that have both the substantial budget and the

robust infrastructure, reliable power, connectivity, data

analysts to fully leverage its advanced capabilities.

But for the vast majority of players, teams, academies.

It's cost and reliance on that ideal infrastructure will

significantly limit its widespread adoption across the

continent. With such significant economic

and technological disparities, that's a fantastic tool, but for

a very specific high end segment of the market.

OK, that provides a really clear picture.

So the final take away for you, our listener, whether you're

involved in sports tech coaching or just interested in the future

of sport in Africa. For true success, for sustained

growth, for making a real impact in the African market, player

tracking system providers, these three, or any others really need

to prioritize solutions that are first and foremost financially

accessible. Manageable costs, ideally one

time payments. Yes.

Second, they must be functionally resilient.

They need to work reliably despite the infrastructure

limitations. Intermittent power, patchy

Internet, offline capabilities are crucial.

Third, user friendliness. Interfaces have to be intuitive,

bridging the skills gap. Setup needs to be simple and

fine. Strong local partnerships,

building trust, providing local support and training, Genuinely

understanding and adapting to the local context.

It's not just about selling hardware, it's about building an

ecosystem of support. It's about meeting the market

where it actually is. That's the bottom line.

Hashtag #shag outro. Wow, what an incredible journey

we've been on today. A true deep dive into player

performance tracking all the way from, you know, the cutting edge

sensor technology, yeah, to the complex economic and

infrastructural realities on the ground in Africa.

It's been fascinating uncovering what it really takes for

innovation to not just exist, but to actually thrive and make

a difference in such a dynamic market.

It really has. It shows that the best Keck

isn't just about specs on a page, is it?

It's about how accessible, how adaptable, how usable it is in

the real world. Absolutely.

This deep dive for me really underscored that the future of

sports technology isn't solely about building the next, you

know, hyper advanced sensor with more metrics.

It's increasingly about ingenious adaptation.

And making sure people can actually use is it exactly

ensuring equitable access to these powerful tools.

It's a really potent reminder that knowledge, like technology,

is most valuable when it's understood in context and

applied effectively to solve real world challenges,

ultimately shaping a more inclusive future for sports

globally. Couldn't agree more?

So as we wrap up, here's a final thought for you, our listener,

to Mull over. Think about this.

What possibilities truly open up when elite technology, the kind

of insights once reserved only for the wealthiest clubs, is

made genuinely accessible, Accessible to every single

aspiring athlete, no matter where they live, no matter what

the local conditions are like Patchy Internet power cuts and

all? Yeah.

What happens then? How does that fundamentally

reshape the landscape of global sports?

Could it level the playing field in unexpected ways?

And maybe, just maybe, could it even inspire entirely new forms

of innovation specifically designed for these unique

challenges, rather than just adapt it to them?

That's a powerful thought to end on.

The potential is immense. It really is.

Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive today.

It's been a pleasure. We'll catch you next time on the

deep dive.

Sports Tech's African Ascent: GPS Trackers, Accessibility, and Real-World Impact

About this episode