How Bayern Munchen Math Beat The Real Madrid Magic
About this episode
How Bayern Munchen Math Beat The Real Madrid Magic
Picture this all right. It is April 15th, 2026.
Oh man, what a night that was. Right, you're standing right
there inside the roaring cauldron of the Allianz Arena in
Munich. Just absolute chaos.
Exactly. I mean there are 75,000 people
just packed into the stands, you can literally smell the freshly
cut grass you know? Yeah, and that weird like acrid
smoke from the flares outside. Yes, the flares and the sharp
scent of nervous sweat from the people press right up against
you in the terraces. It's a sensory overload,
honestly. It totally is.
And then, for just a split second, there is this absolute
breathless silence. I remember that exact moment.
Because we're talking about the UEFA Champions League
quarterfinal second leg Bayern Munich versus Real Madrid.
Heavyweights. Absolute heavyweight.
And on the pitch down below, we are witnessing just an absolute
master class of human endurance. It really was.
It defied all logic. It was a seven goal thriller.
I mean it completely defies logic.
Ending with Bayern winning 4, three on the night and six four
on aggregate. The visual of that night is
literally burned into my brain, like the tension was so thick
you could practically mold it with your hands.
Exactly. Yeah, you have superstars
physically collapsing to the turf in total unadulterated
exhaustion. Guys who are normally machines
just totally gassed. Right, you have this veteran
referee completely surrounded by screaming, desperate players.
Swarmed and. That brief silence shatters and
the crowd erupts with a sound like a commercial jet taking off
right next to your ears. It's deafening.
When you watch a match like that, you know when you were
immersed in that sheer sensory overload, it feels like pure
magic. It really does.
It feels like the football gods are just up there in the clouds,
rolling the dice and laughing at us.
It absolutely feels that way. I mean, the sheer volume of a
match of that magnitude, the noise, the blur of the colors,
the insane momentum swings, it actively tricks the human brain.
It tricks us into believing in the romance, right?
Exactly. It makes us believe we are
watching something entirely unpredictable, something
mystical and, well, chaotic. We get completely caught up in
the narrative. We all do.
It's why we love the game. But, and this is the big but, if
you actually strip away the emotion.
Which is hard to do. Very hard.
But if you force yourself to mute the roar of that crowd and
look at the underlying architecture of what happened
over those 90 minutes, you don't find magic.
What do you find? You find cold, hard, beautiful
mathematics. Oh, I love that cold, hard
mathematics. And that right there, is exactly
our mission today. Because we need to look deeper.
We really do. We are not just here to recount
a historic Champions League clash.
We are not doing a standard run-of-the-mill post match
review where we debate, you know who had a good game and who
didn't. No, we're going way past.
That we are going to take the profound knowledge, the tactical
wisdom and the brutal biological realities displayed on that
pitch, and we're going to extract the hard, data-driven
truths. The underlying telemetry.
Exactly. And crucially, we're going to
use them to benefit our African game.
Because honestly, the contrast is stark.
It really is. Across our continent, we are
culturally obsessed with footballing magic.
We talk endlessly about footballing DNA.
Oh, all the time. DNA this, DNA that.
Right. We pray for the 90th minute
miracle. We rely on the raw, unpolished
improvisational brilliance of our youth.
We really do, but how do we move away from that?
Like how do we build structurally dominant,
physically elite and tactically resilient football institutions
in Africa? That is the multi $1,000,000
question. Because let's be clear, the
African game has never, ever lacked talent.
Whatever. We have the most naturally
gifted, biologically explosive players on the planet, but
talent is just a raw material. What this Bayern Madrid match
proves is that at the absolute pinnacle of the sport, talent
alone does not win. Systems win.
Systems win. Structural advantages dictate
the aggregate every time. To elevate our clubs, our
academies and our national teams, we have to start
understanding the kinematic telemetry, the positional
geometry and the sport science that actually decides these
massive knockout ties. So for you listening right now,
you might be thinking that football is entirely
unpredictable. A lot of people think that.
They do. You might think it's just 22
players chasing a ball and whoever gets a lucky bounce or
has a moment of individual genius wins.
The Romance of the Cup, right? Right.
But today we are stripping away the emotion we are putting on
our analytical lenses to show you the exact deterministic
triggers that cause a tactical collapse in Munich.
We're going to look at the math underneath the magic.
Let's get right into it then. And to do that, we have to start
by completely dismantling A myth that has held back football
analysis for decades. Which one?
The romanticized idea that there is no logic in football.
Oh, people love saying that the ball is round, right?
Right. The ball is round, anything can
happen. People look at upsets and
chaotic moments and conclude that data cannot predict what
happens on a grass pitch. Well, because chaotic events
absolutely do happen. I mean, a ball hits a divot, a
gust of wind changes. A player slips.
Exactly. But you are arguing that while
chaos exists in isolated moments, the underlying
structural advantages dictate the aggregate outcome overtime.
Precisely. Chaos is a localized weather
event. Structure is the climate.
Oh, that's a great way to put it.
Weather versus climate. Exactly.
So let's look at the foundational climates of the two
teams walking onto the pitch that night in Munich.
OK, set the scene for us. Before a single ball is even
kicked, before the referee even blows his whistle, there is a
massive structural disparity between these two clubs.
We call this the coaching coherence gap.
The coaching coherence gap, OK, break that down for us.
What does that gap look like in real numbers?
Well, on the Bayern Munich bench you have Vincent Company, right?
By the time this match kicks off in April 2026, Company has been
in the job for 22 months. 22 months, so almost two years.
Nearly two full years. Think about what that means in
football terms. That is hundreds of daily
training sessions, two full summer preseason.
List video analysis meetings, I'm sure.
Exactly. Deep, methodical, tactical
installations. On the other side, on the Real
Madrid bench, you have Alvaro Arbiloa.
Right, taking over mid season. He took over the senior team
exactly 94 days before this match following the mid season
dismissal of Zabi Alonso. Wow, 22 months versus 94 days.
I mean, just hearing those numbers out loud, the disparity
is staggering. It's a massive gap.
But I have to push back here because history is full of
counter examples, isn't it? We see teams get a new manager
bounce all the time. We do, yeah.
Sometimes the dressing room gets stale, the players tune out the
coach and a fresh voice is exactly what a squad of
superstars needs to suddenly snap into form.
Sure, Chelsea winning the Champions League after changing
managers mid season is a classic example people bring up.
Exactly. So why are you saying that a 22
month tenure is so mathematically critical to
success? Doesn't the new manager bounce
negate that? The new manager bounce is real,
but it is purely psychological and therefore it is volatile and
temporary. OK, volatile.
It might win you 3 or 4 league games against inferior
opposition because the players are suddenly motivated.
But in elite football, especially in the late stages of
the Champions League, time equals tactical integration
depth. Tactical integration depth.
Yes, company didn't just spend 22 months giving inspirational
speeches to make the players feel.
Good, right? It's not just a hype job.
No, he spoke 22 months physically hardwiring and
incredibly complex positional system into his players brains.
Hardwiring. We are talking about creating
automatic neural pathways. So Bayern started the match on
paper in a standard 4231 formations battered enough, but
the moment they gained possession of the ball, it
fluidly and instantly transformed into a hyper
aggressive 2:00 to 6:00. Wait, hold on a 2 to 6.
Yes, a 2 to 6. That sounds like something from
the 1800s. You're saying they basically had
six players on the forward line at the exact same time?
At the exact same time, yes. How do you even do that without
leaving massive gaping holes everywhere else on the pitch?
You do it through obsessive, highly coordinated tactical
training, which is why those 22 months matter so much.
Right, because you can't just teach that on a Thursday
afternoon. Exactly the way they achieved
that 2 to 6 shape is really the genius of the system.
Company used his fullbacks, Conrad Lamer on the right and
initially Joseph Stanich on the left, before Alfonzo Davies came
on later right. He didn't use them as
traditional overlapping runners. They didn't bomb down the
touchline hugging the chalk like you usually see.
Instead they acted as inverted fullbacks.
They tucked inside into the central half spaces.
Let's visualize this for the listener, because if I am
coaching a youth team in, say, Dakar or Nairobi, I teach my
right back to run up the right flank.
Of course, that's traditional football.
Right. So why is Company telling his
right back, Conrad Lammer, to run into the middle of the pitch
right next to the central midfielders?
What does that do mathematically?
It creates an unsolvable geometric puzzle for the
defending team. An unsolvable puzzer.
Yes, first, by moving 2 full backs into the central midfield
area alongside the two defensive midfielders, it instantly
creates A4 versus 2 numerical superiority in the first phase
of buildup. I see.
Bayern has four players centrally against Madrid's two
center forwards. This means Bayern can easily
bypass Real Madrid's initial pressing line purely by passing
the ball around them. Just playing right through the
middle because they have the extra men.
Exactly. But the second effect is even
more devastating. That's that by placing those
fullbacks centrally, it forced Madrid's wide midfielders
Federico Valverde and Arta Guler to make a terrible, terrible
choice. A dilemma, right?
Do they stay wide or do they tuck inside to cover Lamer and
Stanish? Oh I see the trap now.
If Valverde and Guler stay wide, Bayern has a massive numbers
advantage in the middle and just plays straight through the
center. Yes.
But if Valverde and Guler are forced inside to deal with the
inverted fullback. That leaves the wide channels
completely, totally empty. Wow.
Which means Bayern's actual winners, Michael Elise on the
right and Luis Diaz on the left, are left in oceans of space to
go isolated one-on-one with the Madrid fullback.
That is just brutal. Hit pin Madrid deep into their
own half and allowed Bayern to dictate the spatial geometry of
the entire pitch. That is a literal tactical
chokehold, and like you said, that requires an immense amount
of synchronized movement. So much practice.
You can't just draw that on a whiteboard and say go do it.
No, absolutely not. And now contrast that with
Arbiloa's setup. The 94 days.
Arbiloa had 94 days. You simply cannot install a
complex, fluid, highly synchronized positional system
like a 226 in 94 days. It's just not enough time on the
training ground. It is biologically and
cognitively impossible, especially mid season when you
were playing a high stakes match every three days.
You're just doing recovery sessions mostly.
Exactly. So what did he rely on?
He relied on the historical weight of the badge.
The aura of Real Madrid. Right, he literally talked in
the pre match press conference about having 15 European Cups as
if the silver trophies themselves were going to defend
against Michael Elise. Yeah, trophies don't track back.
They don't tactically because he lacked the time to build
complexity. He deployed a very rigid basic
442 mid block. Classic and safe.
Safe, yes, and to maximize his counter attacking threat, he
left Killian Mbappe and Vinicius Junior extremely high up the
pitch, actively discouraging them from tracking back to
defend. OK, here is where my football
fan brain has to intervene. Go for it.
Because I hear the tactics. I hear the spreadsheet analysis
about inverted fullbacks, the 226 shape and numerical
superiority in the half spaces. The math, right?
The math. But we're talking about Killing
and Bape and Venetius Junior. Here, generational talent.
Generational Doesn't raw, unadulterated generational
talent usually beat a spreadsheet?
Well, I mean, it feels like you're telling me that a
perfectly engineered, meticulously coated machine can
always beat a wild, starving lion.
If Imbabe gets the ball in space with 40 yards to run, the
spreadsheet completely goes out the window, doesn't it?
The machine versus the lion. That is a brilliant analogy and
that cuts right to the heart of the debate.
Thank you. And to be fair to your fan
brain, you are right, the lion is absolutely terrifying.
If the Lion gets its jaws on your neck, it is game over.
That is exactly why Real Madrid scored three goals in this
match. They did score 3 times.
Mbappe and Venetius are the ultimate apex predators in
transition, but here is the fatal flaw in relying entirely
on the lion. What's the flaw?
The lion eventually gets tired. Because of the lion has to
expend massive amounts of energy for those explosive sprints,
yes. If the machine is engineered to
systematically starve the lion of oxygen, to force the lion to
chase shadows for 80 minutes, to make the lion start its Sprint
from deeper and deeper positions, eventually the
machine grinds the animal down. Because company's squad had 22
months of integration, they had internalized complex
counterpressing triggers. So the moment they lose the
ball. The millisecond they lost the
ball, they didn't retreat. They knew exactly how to
instantly, aggressively suffocate the space to stop that
initial forward pass to Mbappe. They trapped the lion in a cage.
Exactly. Madrid, conversely, was relying
entirely on individual brilliance to mask the systemic
vulnerabilities of their rigid 442 shape.
Right. By leaving two players high,
Madrid was effectively defending with eight outfield players
against Byron's 10. Let's bring this right back to
our African game. We absolutely must.
Because this dynamic hits incredibly close to home for us.
If you look at club administrators across the
continent, particularly in the CF Champions League or the
domestic leagues in North and sub-Saharan Africa, the
impatience is just legendary. Oh, it's a massive problem.
A coach loses 3 matches in a row, the fans start protesting,
the media demands his head on a platter, and the board fires
him. We operate in a constant,
perpetual state of tactical reset.
It is arguably the single biggest structural flaw holding
African club football back from global dominance.
The constant turnover. Yes, if you fire a coach every
six months, your players never, ever move past the introductory
phase of tactical integration. They never reached the neural
pathway stage. Never.
You're perpetually stuck in our below as 94 day window and
because you don't have a systemic machine, what do you
do? You rely on the lion.
You rely. On the Lion, you rely on
individual brilliance. You pray that your talented
winger does something magical, beats three men and scores from
out of nowhere. We see it in almost every high
stakes match, the tactics breakdown in the second-half and
it just becomes 11 athletes trying to win purely on
instinct. Yes.
And what we need our club presidents, our sporting
directors and our fans to learn from this Bayern Madrid data is
that coaching coherence, giving a manager those 22 months to
build a structural system is not just a nice idea, it's.
Not just a buzzword. It is a measurable mathematical
proxy for success. It beats relying on sheer
passion. It beats relying on the weight
of a historic badge. Definitely look at the clubs in
Africa that actually dominate, like Ali in Egypt or Mamelodi
Sundowns in South Africa. Great examples.
They dominate because they maintain coaching continuity.
They build identifiable complex systems over years, not months.
They trust the process. If you want to compete globally,
you have to protect the manager from the noise of the fans and
let them build the machine. That is such a vital, actionable
take away for anyone involved in football administration on the
continent. Stop hitting the reset button
just when the tactical hardwiring is actually starting
to take. Root.
It's crucial. But as much as we are praising
this perfectly engineered Bavarian machine, we have to
look at how this theory holds up under real extreme stress.
Oh, the stress test was. Real because the 1st 35 seconds
of this match almost broke the machine completely into a
million pieces. The first half of this match,
the density of attacking incident, the sheer emotional
whiplash, It defies belief. It was crazy.
It will go down as one of the most explosive 45 minute periods
in Champions League knockout history.
Let's walk the listener through it, because the context here is
everything. Sure, the referee blows his
whistle. 34 seconds go by Manuel Noyer, the legendary sweeper
keeper, the man who practically invented the modern possession
based goalkeeper role. The absolute pioneer.
Right, he gets the ball at his feet, he tries to play a totally
routine short pass out of his penalty area to start the build
up. Something he's done 10,000
times. Exactly.
And he passes it directly, and I mean perfectly, right to the
feet of Real Madrid's 21 year old Turkish prodigy Arta Geller.
Just a horrific mistake. Geller doesn't even hesitate.
He takes it from 35 yards out and fires it right back over
Neuer into the empty net. Incredible finish honestly. 35
seconds on the clock and the Bayern machine has essentially
stabbed itself in the heart. In the world of football
analytics, what we witnessed there is classified as a massive
negative variance event. OK, let's translate that for the
listener. What exactly is a negative
variance event? Variance is basically luck, or
the statistical noise that deviates from the expected norm.
OK, a goalkeeper of Manuel Neuer's pedigree with his
thousands of hours of elite distribution.
Making an unforced error of that magnitude is a massive
statistical anomaly. It just doesn't happen.
It is an extreme outlier. If you run a computer simulation
of that past 10,000 times, Neuer completes at 9999 times.
But in this reality, he failed. He failed and the resulting
chance for Guler was devastating.
The expected goals on target or XGOT, which measures the
likelihood of a goal based on where the shot is actually aimed
for an open net from that position, was basically 0.98.
It was a 98% guaranteed goal once it left his foot.
Suddenly the aggregate score is tied to two and absolutely all
the momentum, the psychological energy in that stadium suddenly
belongs to Real Madrid. And this is the true Crucible
for everything we just talked about regarding systems versus
emotions, isn't it? It is the ultimate test.
I've seen teams, incredibly talented African teams,
completely collapse after conceding a free goal in the
first minute. Oh, heads drop immediately.
The heads drop, the fans start whistling, the players start
arguing with each other. How did Bayern respond?
This is exactly why the 22 months of coaching coherence
matters so much. A weak system collapses in the
face of negative variance because it relies entirely on
emotional confidence. Right, if you're just riding the
hype and the hype dies. Once the emotion is gone,
there's literally nothing left to fall back on.
A strong system doesn't panic because a strong system relies
on the math. They trust the numbers.
Company did not panic on the touchline.
The Byron players didn't start screaming at Neuer or wildly
abandoning their tactical positions to chase an equalizer.
They stayed in the 226. They just calmly rebooted the
machine. They trusted that their
structural advantages would eventually generate enough
chances to overcome the deficit. And they didn't have to wait
long at all. Not at all.
Within 5 minutes, Bayern's systemic pressure forces a
corner kick. Just sustained pressure.
Joshua Kimmick steps up and whips in a brilliant pacey near
post delivery. Now Madrid's goalkeeper is Andre
Lunan, who was filling in for the injured Thibault Courtois,
right? Lunan misjudges the flight of
the ball entirely. He comes out into no man's land,
gets absolutely nowhere near it, and Alexander Pavlovich,
Bayern's 22 year old midfielder, simply heads it into the net.
A gift, really. Just like that, in the 6th
minute, Bayern restores their aggregate lead.
They absorbed a massive shock and neutralized it immediately.
It was a completely breathless response and it really set the
stage for this incredible violent clash of attacking
philosophies over the rest of the half.
It was a fascinating stylistic matchup.
Because Real Madrid, true to their DNA, did not back down.
In the 29th minute, Arta Guler steps up to a free kick from
about 25 yards out. Oh, this free kick.
I really want to talk about the math on this free kick because
visually it was stunning to watch.
But the data tells a much deeper story about how Madrid operates,
doesn't it? The data on Geller's free kick
perfectly encapsulates Madrid's philosophy under Arbaloa, which
is clinical low volume verticality.
Low volume verticality. Break that down.
Let's look to baseline metric. Expected goals, or XGXG measures
the quality of a chance before the shot is taken.
Based on historical data, a free kick from 25 yards out at that
specific angle against a set defense and a top goalkeeper has
a baseline XG of about 0.05. Meaning that historically, if
you take a hundred shots from that exact spot, only five of
them go in. So it's a very low probability
chance. It is not a high value
opportunity, but Guler's ball striking technique was so elite,
so perfectly calibrated, that he curled it Florida State into the
top right corner. Just perfection.
The post shot XG. The XGOT we mentioned earlier
skyrocketed to 0.33. Based purely on the trajectory
and speed of the ball, he massively outperformed the
probability of the situation. It was pure, unadulterated,
individual magic. The lion roared.
He definitely roared and. Madrid wasn't done there either.
In the 42nd minute, Venetius drops deep, gets loose from his
marker and hits this sweeping, majestic left footed pass that
totally dissects Byron's aggressive high defensive line.
An unbelievable pass. And Boppy latches onto it, takes
one touch and prods it in. So by halftime, Madrid has
scored three goals. Three goals in 45 minutes, but.
Here is the fascinating part. Over the entire match, Madrid
generated A relatively low expected goals total, around
1.97. They didn't actually create a
ton of high quality chances. Meanwhile, Byron is just
relentlessly, systematically pounding on the door using a
completely different metric. Yes.
And this is where we need to introduce a crucial analytical
concept that goes beyond just counting shots.
It's called expected threat or XT.
Expected threat, OK. Expected goals or XG is great,
but it only measures the quality of a shot once it is actually
taken. Right.
It doesn't care how you got there.
Exactly, it doesn't tell you anything about the build up.
Expected threat. XT measures how much a player's
actions, like a successful dribble, a progressive carry up
the pitch, or a line breaking pass, increase the overall
probability of the team scoring even if a shot isn't taken
immediately. O it measured the danger before
the shot. It is the ultimate measure of
territorial dominance and spatial penetration.
OK, that is a bit abstract ground that for me.
In the reality of this specific match, how exactly was Bayern
generating this expected threat without necessarily taking shots
every 30 seconds? Think back to that 226 formation
with the inverted full backs we talked about.
Right, pinning them deep. Bayern was using that shape to
generate immense XT out on the flanks.
Michael Elise, their right winger, was the primary weapon
here. OK, now Real Madrid's left back
is Alvaro Carreras. Statistically, Carreras is an
excellent attacking fullback. He loves to get forward.
He wants to overlap. But companies specifically
targeted his defensive positioning because Bayern had
that 4 versus 2 superiority in the middle.
They could effortlessly move the ball side to side.
Shifting the defense. Exactly.
They systematically isolated Elise against Carreras and later
against Ferlin Mendy when he came on.
They kept feeding Elise the ball in extremely high value zones
right on the edge of the penalty box.
Just constant one on ones. Yes, they weren't just taking
speculative pot shots from 30 yards out like Madrid.
They were methodically working the ball into the penalty area
with devastating repetitive consistency.
Which brings us directly to Harry Kane's goal in the 38th
minute, by the way, his 50th goal of the season, which is
just absurd. The man is a machine.
But the build up to that goal was a flawless textbook example
of what you're talking about with expected threat.
It was a complete masterpiece of systemic execution.
Daiya UPA McConnell, the Bayern center back, executes a
progressive carry out of defense.
He brings the ball out himself. He doesn't just pass it
sideways, he dribbles forward. That is a massive XT action
because it breaks the first line of pressure right.
He steps confidently into the midfield because Madrid's rigid
442 shape has been stretched to breaking point by Bayern's whip.
Ubamakano finds Harry Kane, who has intelligently dropped deep
into a pocket of space. Classic Kane movement.
And why is that space there? Because Trent Alexander Arnold,
the Madrid right back, has suffered a complete positional
blackout. A blackout he pushed up at the
wrong time, vacating his defensive zone completely.
Kane turns. The finish is flawless.
It's utterly clinical. But you have to understand the
goal isn't just about Kane's shot.
It's about the system that got him there.
It's about the systemic volume that mathematically created the
space for the shot. Bayern ended up generating an XG
of nearly 3.0 over the match because of that volume.
It feels exactly like watching a classic heavyweight boxing
match. I love boxing analogies.
You have Real Madrid, who is a fighter that only throws
devastating knockout haymakers, Fueller's free kick from 25
yards and bop A's explosive transition Sprint behind the
defensive line. Those are terrifying, violent
haymakers, absolutely. If they land flush on your chin,
you are on the canvas. The lights are out, done.
But Bayern Munich is the fighter who methodically, relentlessly
works the body with 100 stiff jabs.
Just wearing you down. They keep pressing forward, they
keep isolating the full backs, they keep delivering dangerous
corners, they keep carrying the ball into the final third.
The haymakers are scary, but those 100 jabs inevitably
mathematically drain your life bar until you can barely hold
your hands up. That's the perfect analogy.
The haymaker is visible and thrilling.
The body jab is invisible but cumulative.
Cumulative. Exactly.
And this brings us to a massive fundamental application for the
African game. Let's hear it When we look at
our grassroots football, when we visit academies from Dakar to
Lagos to Nairobi, what are we teaching our young players?
We overwhelmingly praise the haymaker.
Yes, we celebrate the 14 year old kid who can do five step
overs, dribble past four players and score a wonder goal from 30
yards. We are culturally obsessed with
moments of transitional individual magic.
It is so true. You go to a local youth game.
If a kid plays a simple, highly intelligent, line breaking pass
to keep possession moving and shift the defense, nobody claps.
It goes completely unnoticed. The parents don't cheer, but if
he tries a completely unnecessary rainbow flick and
then choose from distance, the crowd goes absolutely wild.
We validate the wrong behaviors. Exactly.
We reward the inefficiency because it looks flashy.
And that cultural bias translates all the way up the
pyramid from youth academies to our professional leagues right
up to our national teams. It's systemic.
We build squads that passively wait around for a moment of
magic, but at the elite global level, praying for magic is a
mathematically losing strategy. You can't just hope.
We need to completely overhaul our Academy curricula to teach
the concept of offensive volume. We need to teach the concept of
expected threat to kids. Teach them the math.
We need to teach our young wingers how to hold their width,
you know, keeping chalk on their boots to isolate a defender.
We need to teach our central midfielders how to dictate field
tilt. Field tilt?
What's that? It's a metric that measures
territorial dominance by calculating the share of passes
A-Team makes in the final third compared to their opponent.
So basically, who is playing in the dangerous areas more often?
Exactly. Sustained, methodical
territorial control is what wins major tournaments.
Relying on counter attacking haymakers might win you a single
glorious match, but over a grueling 90 minute war of
attrition against a highly tuned system, the volume based machine
will physically and mentally break you.
That is profound. We really need to stop teaching
our kids to be walking highlight reels and start teaching them to
be intelligent, efficient cogs in an offensive machine.
It's the only way we progress. But Speaking of a war of
attrition, we cannot talk about this match without talking about
the sheer brutal physical toll it took the physical.
Toll was insane. Because when you strip away the
tactics, the formations and the data models, football is
fundamentally A biological contest between human bodies.
It always comes down to biology. And the data from this match
reveals what is without a doubt the most devastating statistic
of the entire evening. It is the single statistic that
explains absolutely everything that happened in the chaotic
final 10 minutes. Oh, is it the kinematic tracking
dayner? The advanced telemetry that
measures every single step, every high intensity Sprint,
every deceleration, every micro movement of every player on the
pitch revealed this. Bayern Munich covered 110.9
kilometers as a team in this match.
Real Madrid covered 101.9 kilometers. 110.9 compared to
101.9 that is a massive 9 kilometer difference. 9
kilometers I mean. Just to visualize that 9
kilometers, that's like running from the absolute center of a
major city all the way out into the deep suburbs.
It's an insane distance to cover.
It is a staggering amount of extra ground covered, but what
does that actually mean in the mathematical context of a
football match? In the realm of elite football
analytics, A9 kilometer aggregate deficit is the
physiological equivalent of playing with a ghost player.
A ghost player? OK, unpack that concept for me,
because obviously there were still 11 Madrid players on the
pitch. Let's look at the biology An
average elite outfield player covers anywhere between 9:00 and
11:00 kilometers in a standard 90 minute match.
OK, that makes sense. So if your team is being outrun
by exactly 9 kilometers overall, your opponent is effectively
putting out the physical biomechanical output of 11 men,
while your team is only putting out the physical output of 10
men. Spatially and geometrically, you
are playing short handed. You are playing ten against 11
without a red card even being shown.
Just getting out work that badly.
And we have to remember why this happened.
Arbelo's tactical decision to leave Mbappe and Venetius high
up the pitch meant they weren't tracking back to help
defensively. The Lions were resting.
Right, so the remaining 8 Real Madrid outfield players were
forced to cover the massive spatial geometry of 10 men.
They were running themselves into the ground just to
desperately plug the gaps created by Bayern's 226
overloads. That is mind blowing.
The geometry literally dictates the biology.
But wait, we have to look at the age profiles of these two teams,
because when you look at the rosters, this running deficit
completely flips conventional football wisdom on its head.
It really does. Usually you automatically assume
the younger spry team will outrun the older aging team, but
Bayern starting 11 was significantly older than
Madrid's. This is the truly fascinating
part. Bayern's starting lineup had an
average age of 28.9 years. That's getting up there for a
squat average. This is a battle hardened
veteran corps. You had Manuel Noyer at 40 years
old, Harry Kane at 32, Joshua Kimmich at 31, Leon Goretska at
31. Lot of my eyes on those legs.
Real Madrid, on the other hand, has heavily invested over the
last few years in this under 23 physiological advantage.
They're starting 11, averaged just 26.6 years.
Very young. They were leaning incredibly
heavily on the raw, youthful engine of Jude Bellingham at 22,
Eduardo Kamivinga at 23 and Arta Guler at 21.
So you're telling me that this older Byron squad, these guys
well into their 30s, actually outlasted and outran the
younger, supposedly more athletic and energetic Madrid
squad? By 9 kilometers.
How is that biologically possible?
Doesn't youth inherently equal energy?
Youth equals explosive energy. Youth gives you high velocity
Sprint speed and transition. The fast twitch muscle fiber
activation. Which is exactly why Madrid was
so incredibly dangerous on the counter attack with those
haymakers. Right, that burst to speed.
But sustained 90 minute aerobic endurance is an entire fairly
different biological matrix. Bayern's veteran corps possesses
seasoned bio mechanics, deep muscular endurance and vast
psychological reservoir. They know how to pace
themselves. Exactly.
More importantly, it all comes back to Company's tactical
system and his squad rotation. Because Company had already
secured the Bundesliga title mathematically, he heavily
rotated his squad the weekend prior.
Also, they were arrested. They entered this match at
absolute peak physiological readiness.
Arbiloa, conversely, was fighting an incredibly tight
domestic race in La Liga and couldn't afford to rest as key
players. So Madrid entered the match with
a pre-existing biological deficit.
Yes, and then because of the tactics, those players were
asked to do the running of 10 men with only eight players.
The midfield routing in particular was just brutal to
watch, wasn't it? Kimmick and Pavlovich basically
put on a clinic. They absolutely dominated the
field tilt. Joshua Kimmich was rated an 8
out of 10 by most analytical models.
He was the metronome. Just ticking away.
He was dictating the tempo, probing the half spaces, moving
the ball effortlessly. Pavlovich, despite his youth,
covered enormous ground, proactively suffocating Madrids
passing lanes. And on the Madrid side?
On the other side, look at Federico Valverde.
Valverde is widely considered an absolute physical machine, a
freak of nature. He ran over 11 kilometers by
himself in this match. Just him alone.
But because of Bayern's wide overloads and narrow central
pressing traps, Valverde and Bellingham were reduced to
reactive defensive sweeping. Always chasing.
They weren't orchestrating attacks, they were just
desperately sprinting side to side putting out fires.
They were biologically exhausted by the 70th minute.
And this exhaustion, we really need to dive deeper into this
because it's not just about heavy legs or gasping for air
is. No, it's far more dangerous.
When we talk about physical exhaustion in elite sports, we
have to talk about the unseen damage.
We have to talk about what it does to the human brain.
Exactly. This is the absolute crux of the
biological matrix. As the match progressed into the
final decile, the last 10 to 15 minutes, the anaerobic threshold
of the Madrid midfield degraded entirely.
They hit the wall. When your muscles are starved of
oxygen, lactic acid accumulates rapidly, and when that central
nervous system fatigue sets in, it doesn't just slow down your
top Sprint speed. What else does it do?
It severely impairs your prefrontal cortex.
It destroys your spatial awareness.
Your cognitive processing speed plummets.
You literally can't think straight.
Your decision making latency increases by vital milliseconds.
You literally biologically cannot think as fast or as
clearly in the 80th minute as you could in the first minute.
Which is such a brilliant, terrifying lesson for the
African continent. It really is.
Because if there was one thing African football is known for
globally is our raw, explosive physical talent.
Unmatched anywhere. Our players are incredibly fast,
they are strong, they are naturally athletic.
But what you're saying is that raw speed is completely useless
if the physiological engine burns out by the 80th minute.
It is actually worse than useless.
It becomes an act of liability. Wow, a liability.
We possess incredible raw physical talent in Africa, but
if we don't apply elite sport science backed physical
conditioning paired with that structural geometry we talked
about, that talent is utterly wasted.
Just burned up. We have to move way beyond the
old school mentality of just running our players into the
ground with laps around the pitch.
For Quote UN Quote Fitness, we need ETS tracking telemetry in
our domestic leagues. ETS Electronic performance and
tracking systems, right? The little GPS trackers the
players wear in those sports bras under their kits.
Exactly those they measure acceleration, deceleration,
heart rate, metabolic load. We need sports scientists at our
clubs actively measuring VO2 Max and anaerobic thresholds.
Taking it to a scientific level. But more importantly, we have to
teach our players that running smarter, maintaining structural
geometry, letting the ball do the work, moving in synchronized
blocks preserves the cognitive function you desperately need in
the 89th minute. Because the brain needs that
oxygen to make the right pass. Exactly.
Endurance combined with tactical running must become our ultimate
weapon. We cannot rely solely on raw
transitional speed. That is a harsh, sobering, but
entirely necessary truth, and it perfectly sets up the climax of
this entire deep dive. The big moment.
Because everything we have just talked about over the last hour,
the coaching gap, the expected threat volume, the massive 9
kilometer running deficit, the cognitive degradation caused by
lactic acid, it all collides violently in the 86th minute of
this match. The perfect storm.
This is the inflection point. This is the exact moment where
Physiology literally meets officiating.
The 86th minute inflection point.
This is the moment that defined the entire 20252026 Champions
League season. It is the moment that has been
debated endlessly in bars, on television and in discussions
ever since. Let's set the scene vividly for
the listeners. They understand the stakes.
It is the 86th minute. The aggregate score across the
two legs is tied at 44. Razor thin.
Real Madrid is currently leading 32 on the night.
The tension in the stadium is absolutely unbearable.
You can barely hear yourself think extra time is looming on
the horizon. Everyone is exhausted.
Alvar Abaloa had brought on Eduardo Kama Vinga in the 61st
minute to try and stabilize a completely overrun midfield.
But he was struggling. Kama Vinga's having a nightmare.
He's struggling to catch the pace of the game.
He's already on a yellow card for a cynical tactical foul on
Jamal Musiala earlier. Right, he's walking a tightrope.
And then the moment happens. Under immense, suffocating press
pressure from Bayern, Kamivinga commits a relatively standard
clumsy foul on Harry Kane just inside Bayern's half.
Nothing crazy. It's a foul, no question.
The referee blows his whistle to stop play, and then Kamivinga
makes a decision that defies all rational football logic.
What does he do? He inexplicably reaches down,
picks up the ball with his hands and casually jogs away with it,
deliberately preventing Bayern Munich from taking a quick free
kick to keep their momentum going.
It's the most basic, transparent form of time wasting, and to be
fair, players do it all the time.
They do, but the context here is highly combustible.
The referee is Slavko Vintage from Slovenia.
He reaches into his pocket and this is where the controversy
absolutely explodes across global media.
Multiple sources close to the Madrid camp are Biloa himself,
Jude Bellingham, Antonio Rudiger.
They all aggressively suggested in the post match press
conferences that Vintage did not initially realize Kamivinga was
already on a yellow card. Oh, that he forgot.
They claim he signaled for a standard free kick and was going
to let it go, but instantly, the moment Kamivinga touches the
ball, Bayern's veteran Kormuciala Kimmich Pavlovich,
they completely swarmed. Vintage.
They saw the opportunity. They weaponized the noise and
the pressure of the 75,000 screaming Bavarian fans.
They point out that Kama Vinga is already on a yellow, and they
loudly remind the referee that delaying a restart is a
mandatory, bookable offense under strict UEFA directives.
By the letter of the law. Vintage supposedly realizes his
administrative error, pulls out the second yellow card, and then
branches the red card. Kama Vinga is sent off.
Real Madrid, already exhausted, is down to 10 men.
And the aftermath is just brutal to witness.
The dam breaks. Immediately.
Within 3 minutes, in the 89th minute, Luis Diaz finds a pocket
of space that simply didn't exist before the red card, and
he scores to put Byron ahead on aggregate.
Because Madrid was missing a man.
Then deep into stoppage time in the 94th minute, Harry Kane
picks out Michael Elise, who curls in the final dagger to
seal the win. 43 Byron on the night 64-ON aggregate.
And the chaos gets even uglier. After the final whistle blows,
an enraged articular confronts the referee screaming in his
face and gets a straight red card for dissent.
Our below it tells the press quote he ruined a beautiful tie.
Bellingham calls the officiating a joke.
The Spanish press went into absolute OverDrive.
They labeled it a massive referee injustice.
They claimed UEFA wanted Byron to advance.
But this is exactly why we do data-driven forensic analysis.
We don't deal in conspiracy theories.
We have to deconstruct that emotional narrative.
When you look at the biology and the telemetry from a data
perspective, this was not an injustice at all.
It was a deterministic trigger. A deterministic trigger.
I want you to explain that because fans look at that red
card and say the ref ruined the game.
It was a freak accident. Kama Vinga just had a brain
fade. That's the easy excuse.
But you are arguing that the red card wasn't a random lightning
strike from a clear sky, it was the final cracking wooden beam
snapping under a roof that had been carrying three feet of
heavy snow all winter long. That is exactly the metaphor.
Let's look at all the variables that led to that specific
moment. You have a substitute
midfielder, Kama Vinga, entering a match at the highest possible
emotional and physical intensity.
Right, he's thrown into the. He hasn't had time to acclimate
to the pace he is operating under the immense, relentless
pressing load of a Bayern team that has completely dominated
possession and actively forced Madrid to run nine extra
kilometers. The ghost player effect.
We just spent 20 minutes discussing how severe physical
exhaustion leads directly biologically to cognitive
degradation. Kamivinga's decision to pick up
that ball and time waste while he was already sitting on a
yellow card was not random bad. It was fatigue.
It was a direct, measurable symptom of that acute biological
exhaustion. His central nervous system was
absolutely fried. He suffered a critical cognitive
lapse. Now, the data models didn't
predict that Cama Vinga specifically would get a red
card in exactly the 86th minute. They're not psychic.
No, but the predictive disciplinary risk modeling
absolutely flagged a player in his exhausted condition as an
extreme vulnerability. So you were saying it wasn't bad
luck at all, It was the underlying math and the spatial
geometry finally catching up to the human biology?
Yes, the system broke the human. And let's look at the referee,
Slavko Vintage, because the data applies to him too.
Referees have stats too. His historical refereeing data
shows an average of 4.10 yellow cards per match.
He has a very low 0.77 foul to tackle ratio, meaning he is
statistically very strict on physical contact and procedural
infringements. He.
Doesn't let things go. When you combine a strict
referee, a physically exhausted and cognitively impaired
defensive unit, and relentless, suffocating offensive pressure
from Bayern, a red card is a highly probable statistical
outcome. It is math, not magic.
It is cause and effect. This is such a monumental lesson
for the African game. We see this exact scenario play
out all the time in SICCAF club competitions, in the C CAF
Confederation Cup and in the Africa Cup of Nations.
A team plays their absolute hearts out, They run themselves
to a standstill, they get physically exhausted and in the
88th minute a player makes a rash late tackle or argues
aggressively with the referee and gets sent off.
And what do we do? We blame the referee, we say
it's a grand conspiracy, we say the ref was bribed by the
opposition. We stormed the pitch.
We constantly externalize the blame.
Always. It is a defense mechanism are
below It did the exact same thing in his press conference,
he said. The referee ruined the tie.
Instead of looking at his tactics.
He refused to look at his own tactical setup that caused his
players to run nine extra kilometers.
Vincent Company on the other hand, talked about his players
immense mental strength and their adherence to the system.
Night and day. One coach took ownership of the
structure, the other externalized the failure onto an
official. If we truly want to elevate
African football, we must train our players in emotional
regulation and deep discipline under high stress.
Mental conditioning. We have to understand that the
psychological temperature of knockout football is a
measurable, manageable variable. Cognitive fatigue leads directly
to unforced errors, and at the highest elite level, the math
will punish those errors instantly.
Without mercy. We have to build physical
conditioning programs that protect our players brains in
the 90th minute, not just their legs.
Stop blaming the CF referees for what is ultimately A biological
failure of our own making. Absolutely.
The accountability has to start internally now.
As much as I deeply love this deterministic, data-driven
narrative you are weaving, intellectual honesty demands
that we test it. Let's test it.
We cannot just accept the spreadsheet as gospel without
trying to poke holes in it. We have to try and break the
model. So I'm going to play devil's
advocate. I'm going to throw the absolute
strongest counter arguments at you from the skeptics who hate
analytics. I welcome it.
Bring them on. Let's see if the structure holds
up. Counter argument #1 What if the
red card was literally the only reason Bayern Munich won?
Think about the timeline. At 86 minutes, Madrid is leading
32. The aggregate is 44.
If come a Vingit doesn't have that cognitive laps.
If he just leaves the ball alone and doesn't get sent off, Madrid
very likely takes the game to extra time.
That's a possible outcome. And in an extra 30 minutes, with
the game stretched and Boppe and Venetius running against tired
Bayern legs. Therefore, all this dense data
about 9 kilometer deficits at expected threat is academic
nonsense. And the entire game was decided
by 1 human error from a tired player and a strict referee.
How do you respond to that? It's a very compelling argument,
and it's the one. Most fans naturally gravitate
toward because it's simple. It's a clean narrative, but it
completely ignores. The concept of momentum.
Pressure and statistical sustainability.
Yes, the red card was the immediate visible catalyst for
the final two goals. I am not denying right, but the
expected threat and territorial control data tell us that
Bayern's dam breaking pressure was mathematically inevitable.
Real Madrid was defending with just 31.5% possession.
They barely had the ball. You cannot sustain.
A deep reactive. Block against a team generating
nearly 3.0 expected goals without eventually conceding.
Whether you have 11 men on the pitch or 10, the pressure was
building. That dam was cracking the red
card. Simply accelerated the.
Collapse, but the structural foundations of Madrid's were
already completely fractured by Bayern's relentless offensive
volume. The dam was going to break.
Camavinka just happened to be the crack that gave way.
OK, counter argument #2 let's talk about efficiency.
You mentioned XG earlier. Well, Madrid generated a higher
expected goals total from significantly fewer shots.
They had 1.97 XG from just twelve shots.
Bayern had around 2.09 XG from 20 shots, so Madrid was actually
the far more efficient attacking team on a per shot basis.
Absolutely. They didn't need 20.
Shots to score three goals. You could argue that our below
is counter attacking setup was tactically optimal and they only
lost because of a freak mistake, not a systemic failure.
Of his 442, Madrid was incredibly clinical, yes.
Outperforming your XG by scoring three goals from 1.97 XG is a
massive testament to the elite generational ball striking
ability of players like Guler and Mbappe.
The Lions again, but generating chances.
Purely through. Rapid transitions while holding
only 31% possession is mathematically unsustainable
over 180 minutes of a two leg tie.
Why is it unsustainable? High XG.
Chances created from transitions.
Are incredibly volatile. They depend entirely on the
opponent making a mistake, like Neuer's first minute passing
error or Trent Alexander Arnold pushing up too far.
You're waiting for them to mess up Bayern's chances.
Conversely, were generated. Systematically systemic
generation is repeatable. Transitional reliance is
volatile. Over a large enough sample size,
the repeatable system always, always wins out over the
volatile moments of individual brilliance.
All right, final counter argument.
Let's look at the manager. Himself.
What if Vince and company is the variable here, not the data?
What do you mean? What if coaching quality isn't?
Just a data point on a. Spreadsheet but an
unquantifiable art form company made brilliant human decisions
during the match, calming his players after the Neuer error
adjusting his press, he managed the game beautifully a
different. Coach armed with the exact.
Same 226 system and the same data might have panicked and
lost. Therefore human intuition and
leadership beat the spreadsheet. We can't reduce companies sold
to numbers. I actually concede a.
Significant portion of this argument Coaching is an art
form. It requires empathy, emotional
intelligence and leadership. Data absolutely cannot model the
complex human processing that converts tactical inputs into on
pitch outcomes right. You can't measure a locker room
speech, but here's the. Catch coaching tenure is a
highly. Measurable proxy for tactical
integration depth companies. Human decisions in the 80th
minute were excellent precisely because he had 22 months of
data, daily observation and deep relationship building with his
players. He knew them inside and out.
He knew his players. Psychological breaking points.
He knew his system was robust enough to handle the negative
variance. Our below is 94 days.
Simply didn't give him that extensive database of human
knowledge. He didn't have the foundation.
So yes. Company's genius was.
Deeply human, But the conditions for that human genius to
flourish were structurally created over 22 months.
That makes a lot of sense. You can't divorce the human.
From the time they've had to build trust.
But even with all this incredibly dense data, all this
telemetry and expected threat, there are things we just cannot
measure. Of course, in intelligence
analysis and military strategy, they often talk about Dahmer
Rumsfeld's concept of the unknown, unknowns, things we
don't even know that we don't know.
How does that concept apply to a chaotic football match?
It applies massively and it is the.
Humility that every single data analyst and sports scientist
must have data is not omniscient.
What are the unknown unknowns in this specific?
Match first dressing room dynamics.
We simply do not. Know the internal psychological
state of the Madrid squad under our Biloa.
Did the senior players fully trust him after Jabababi Alonso
was abruptly fired? Was Kombanga's indiscipline on
the pitch a sign of deeper personal frustration with his
role? We cannot model interpersonal
dressing room politics. Second, physical micro
conditions. Without access to the exact raw
EPTS tracking data from Madrid's medical department, we can't
definitively say if Kemah Vinga's lapse was purely aerobic
fatigue or if he was carrying a minor unseen microinjury that
was affecting his bio mechanics and causing him frustration.
And what about the referee's cognitive state?
Referees. Are human beings too, They get
tired. Exactly.
Did Slavkovich genuinely. Momentarily forget that Kemah
Vinga was on a yellow card in the heat of the moment.
If he did, that is a sudden unpredictable cognitive negative
lapse by the official. You simply cannot put a
referee's momentary memory loss into a pre match predictive data
model. And the crowd, the noise, the.
Emotional contagion of 75. 1000 Roaring fans Academic sports
psychology research absolutely proves that intense crowd noise
subconsciously alters referee decisions and player risk
taking, but you cannot isolate its exact mathematical impact on
Cama Vinga's prefrontal cortex in the 86th minute.
So if I can use another analogy, please do.
If data is the meteorological weather.
Forecast. Telling us there's a 90% chance
of rain based on barometric pressure.
These unknown unknowns are like a sudden freak meteor crashing
into the stadium. The meteor.
You can't model the meteor, it's not in the data, but you still
bring an umbrella to handle the rain you can predict.
That is exactly it. I love that analogy data.
Narrows the uncertainty interval.
It tells you exactly where the edges of probability are.
It does not eliminate chaos, but it manages it.
It prepares you to survive the meteor strike because your
foundation is strong. And this brings us to the final,
and perhaps most. Crucial application for the
African game let's tie it all together because we cannot just.
Blindly copy paste. European data models and expect
them to work perfectly in our context.
We have different pitches, different travel logistics,
different cultural pressures. We have to adapt this knowledge
to our reality. The balance between trusting
analytics and managing the human element is everything precisely
our African clubs must. Adopt A robust 2 layered
operational model. OK, what's layer one?
Layer one is the structural model.
Focusing on. Territorial control, expected
threat, possession geometry and elite physical conditioning.
This is the unglamorous foundation you build over 22
months of coaching. Coherence and layer two.
Layer 2 is the volatility. Model.
Preparing for error risk, practicing emotional management,
minimizing transition exposure, and conditioning players for the
sheer unadulterated chaos of playing a sock half Champions
League away match in front of 80,000 hostile fans in a hostile
environment. You have to train the machine to
be perfect, but you also have to train the human players to
survive the meteor strikes. OK, let's bring this all
together. We've journeyed.
Through an absolute tactical and biological epic today.
It's been a deep dive for sure. We looked at a.
Champions League match that felt.
To the naked eye, like pure magic.
A chaotic 43 thriller that sent Bayern Munich to the semifinals
and broke Real Madrid's hearts. A historic night.
But when we stripped it down. When we muted the crowd.
We saw the cold truth. Bayern Munich didn't win by
magic. They absorbed three massive
shocks, including a 35 second goalkeeper disaster, and they
still triumphed because of the structure, because they won
through a. Systemic.
Highly. Calibrated machine of physical
output, running a massive 9 kilometers more than their
opponents and forcing cognitive collapse.
They outworked them. They won through brilliant.
Tactical geometry. Utilizing an inverted 226
formation to generate relentless expected threat and isolate
defenders, the math was on their side and they won through
coaching. Continuity proving.
Mathematically that a 22 month vision will ultimately crush a
94 day emotional reaction. Their underlying math was just
vastly superior, and that is the ultimate lesson we have to take
away. The exact final score line was
unpredictable. Kemah Vinga picking up the ball
and getting a red card in the 86th minute was unpredictable.
You can't script that. But the aggregate advancement of
Bayern? Munich was the.
Highest probability outcome all along the data identified the
structural edges and over 94 grueling minutes, those edges
sliced right through the romance and the mythology of Real Madrid
So to you listening right now, whether you.
Are a passionate fan, a youth coach in an Academy or an
administrator running a professional club on the
continent? Data doesn't physically play the
match, but it maps out exactly where the edges of reality are.
It gives you the blueprint. In Africa, we've relied on our
RAW. Talent our deep.
Passion and our prayers for decades.
But if we want to truly elevate the African game onto the global
throne, we have to look in the mirror and ask ourselves a very
serious question. Are we still just hoping for a
magical 90th minute moment from a generational talent, or are we
finally ready to do the cold, hard, beautiful mathematics of
building a 90 minute machine? It's time to build the machine.
Thanks for joining. Us on this incredible journey
through the numbers. The tactics and the biology of
the beautiful game. Keep questioning what you see on
the pitch, look for the hidden geometry behind every pass and
we will see you next time on the deep dive.
But before you go, I want you to think about this the next time
your team concedes a freak goal in the first minute of a crucial
match. Do you want 11 layers who panic,
drop their heads and look to the heavens for a miracle?
Or do you want 11 layers who just calmly recalculate the
robabilities and restart the machine?
Podbean