Eyeball: AI Youth Football Scouting Revolution

You know that feeling right where you want to really get

your head around something big, something changing the game, but

there's just so much information out there.

Well, that's what we're aiming for today.

Think of this as your fast track to really understanding a major

shift happening right now in football, specifically how clubs

find and recruit young talent. Yeah, it's a fascinating area

because it's moving so quickly. For, well, for decades, scouting

young players was very boots on the ground.

Wasn't it right Muddy pitches? Personal contacts.

Exactly, all that stuff built on relationships, local knowledge,

hours and hours of watching games live.

But now technology is really stepping in and honestly

reshaping everything. And a big part of that seems to

be this thing called eyeball. Now, it's not about actual

eyeballs, obviously, or stronger binoculars for scouts.

It's this online platform, kind of like a massive digital

scouting network, absolutely packed with video footage of

young players from, well, all over the globe.

But it's more than just a huge video library.

That's the key thing. It uses artificial intelligence

AI to crunch the data and help clubs pinpoint the players with

real potential. It's quite sophisticated.

OK, so it's like a central hub where clubs can get way more

info on youth players than ever before?

Precisely far beyond what 1 scout or even a team of scouts

could gather traditionally. So our mission today really is

to unpack how this system works, what kind of impact it's

actually having, and maybe think about what it means for the

future of finding football talent.

OK, sounds good. Let's start maybe with a bit of

context. How did scouting typically work

before things like eyeball came along?

It was quite localized for a long time, wasn't it?

Oh definitely. For ages, scouts operated within

pretty defined geographical areas.

They relied heavily on their personal contacts, you know,

coaches, local clubs, maybe results from specific

tournaments. It was very relationship driven.

Which sounds valuable, but also. That's the crucial point.

Traditional youth scouting absolutely had its limitations.

Geography was a big one. If a talented kid was outside

the known networks or in a region a club didn't actively

scout, they could just slip through the cracks easily.

And the reliance on personal contacts, while good for, say,

trust, could also bring in biases.

Scouts might favor players from coaches they know or overlook

others and the sheer time and travel involved.

I can only imagine flights, hotels, endless hours by the

side of pitches. It must have been incredibly

expensive too. Hugely expensive and time

consuming, plus you're often making big decisions based on

maybe seeing a player just a few times, relying heavily on that

scout's subjective judgment. There was definitely a growing

need for something more efficient, maybe more objective,

and certainly wider reaching. Yeah, it feels like the scale of

modern football kind of demanded a change.

Absolutely. And you saw technology creeping

in even before eyeball really took off.

Data analytics started playing a bigger role even with younger

players, and video analysis became more common, but Eyeball

really takes that to another level.

It's designed as a comprehensive solution to tackle those

traditional problems head on. Efficiency, cost, reach, and

adding that data-driven layer. OK, so let's dive into Eyeball

itself then. You said it's an online

platform, huge video database. What kind of scale are we

actually talking about? The numbers are pretty

staggering. They host video on over 230,000

youth players now. Wow, 230,000.

Yeah. And importantly, it's not just

random footage. They focus strategically on

elite youth talent players in the top youth leagues, primarily

across Europe initially, but with a really significant and

growing presence in Africa, particularly West Africa.

And they've got clear plans to expand further into the US and

Latin America next. So this isn't like kids having

to kick about in the park. This is footage from established

Academy serious youth setups. Exactly.

The goal is to bridge that gap between professional football

and the top end of the amateur or youth game, to create a real

pathway for talented players, maybe 1 slightly off the beaten

track to get noticed by professional clubs.

And for the clubs themselves, what's the main driver?

Better recruitment. That's the core aim, yes.

Optimize Academy recruitment, find those potential stars

earlier, track their development, and ultimately this

contributes to the club's overall strategy, developing

players for the first team or, you know, generating revenue

through player sales later on. And you mentioned a more

scientific angle. It's not just watching clip,

there's data behind. It That's right, it integrates

the video evidence with searchable performance data.

So clubs aren't just relying on the eye test from the video,

they can back up their assessments or challenge them

with actual metrics. It adds a layer of objectivity

alongside the Scouts intuition. OK, let's get into the nuts and

bolts then. What are the key features?

If I'm a scout logging into Eyeball, what can I actually do?

Well, the foundation is that massive video database we talked

about those hundreds of thousands of players, the

coverage is smart. Europe, West Africa are the

current strongholds, places known for producing talent.

They cover a decent age range too, typically from under

twelves right up to under 20 ones.

Across different levels like National Youth teams as well as

club teams. Yeah, various league levels from

regional up to national and even international youth competitions

are included. So yeah, a scout sitting in,

say, Manchester could be watching an under 17 match from

Denmark or an Academy game in Ghana, all on their screen.

That's incredible reach, and it's not just full 90 minute

matches. No, and that's crucial for

efficiency. They offer full match videos,

yes, but also curated highlight clips which are great for that

initial quick look at a player and alongside the video you get

comprehensive performance data. OK, tell me more about the

player profiles. What info is there?

You get the basics, age, nationality, current club

position, that sort of thing. But crucially, you also get AI

compiled statistics right there on the profile and direct links

to all the available match footage for that player on the

platform, so you can easily jump between their stats and the

actual video evidence. Right, so you see a stat like

high number of successful dribbles you can click and watch

examples straight away. That must save so much time

compared to trolling through full games.

Huge amounts of time. And it's not just clubs pushing

information out. Players themselves or their

representatives can create and customize profiles.

They can upload their own highlight reels, showcase their

skills directly. Interesting.

Like a sort of professional portfolio for young footballers.

Kind of, yeah. It gives players, maybe those

not in the biggest academies, a chance to put themselves in the

shop window, so to speak, a Direct Line to potentially

hundreds of scouts. OK, let's talk more about the

data. You mentioned stats, How deep

does it go? It goes pretty deep.

They actually track around 60 different data points per player

per game, but for ease of use they highlight thirteen key

statistical parameters upfront, things scouts look for

immediately. Like what kind of things?

Things like passes completed, especially in the final third.

You know, successful take ONS, shots on target, crosses

attempted defensive duels. 1 metrics that give you a quick

snapshot of a player's style and effectiveness.

And you can search based on this data.

Absolutely. That's one of the most powerful

aspects. All this data is searchable, so

if a club is looking for say a young left back under 18 who

averages more than 5 interceptions per game and has a

high crossing accuracy, they can literally filter the entire

database to find players who match that specific profile.

Wow, that's moving from casting a wide net to really targeted

fishing, isn't it? Precisely.

It makes the initial search incredibly efficient.

And then there's the AI layer on top of that.

Eyeball uses AI to generate its own player ratings.

Based on the data. Based on their performance data,

yeah, it gives an objective first assessment of a player's

overall quality. But it doesn't stop there.

They also do more advanced AI analysis across 48 unique

metrics. 48 OK, now you're really getting into the weeds.

What kind of things does that cover?

This is where it gets really nuanced.

It looks at things like ball progression.

How effectively does a player move the ball up the pitch?

Space creation? Do their movements open up space

for teammates? Pressing intensity?

Defensive positioning? Recovery runs?

It tries to quantify those subtle but really important

parts of the game. Things that are hard to just,

you know, count manually. Exactly.

Things a good scout might feel intuitively, but the AI tries to

put a number on it. And all of this feeds into those

really sophisticated search and filtering tools.

You can combine video observation with multiple data

parameters to find exactly what you're looking for.

It sounds like you could almost design your ideal player profile

and see if anyone in the world matches it.

That's getting closer to the reality, yes, and they're even

looking at future stuff like voice activated search.

Yeah, the concept is a scout could literally say something

like show me young midfielders who play like Pedry and the AI

would understand the characteristics of Pedri's game,

his close control, passing range, movement, and search the

database for players with similar statistical and

stylistic profiles. OK, that's definitely bordering

on sci-fi. What about the human side?

Collaboration, communication, scouting finds the player, but

then the club has to act. Eyeball helps there too.

The platform allows direct contact between clubs, so if

club A sees a player at club B they like, they can initiate

contact through the system, which could streamline things,

maybe cut down on reliance on intermediaries sometimes.

OK. And internally within a club,

coaches can use it as a development tool.

They can grab specific clips of a youth player from the

platform, maybe showing good examples or areas needing work,

and share that directly with the player along with performance

analysis. Makes feedback very specific and

visual. Right.

So it connects the scouting department with the coaching

staff and even the players themselves.

Makes sense. Yeah.

OK, we understand the features now, but what's the technology

actually doing behind the scenes?

How do they get all this video and data?

Yeah, the video acquisition is fundamental.

Obviously they build partnerships directly with youth

clubs and academies, and often a key part of the deal is that

Eyeball provides the camera systems to the clubs, often at

no cost to the club itself. Ah.

So they incentivize clubs to provide footage by giving them

the gear. Exactly, it helps ensure they

get a consistent flow of video, especially from maybe lower

leagues or youth levels where good quality recording wasn't

always standard practice. They stress their hardware

agnostic though, meaning meaning they're not tied to one specific

type of camera. Their focus is on getting good

quality coverage, clear video, wide angles that their system

can analyze effectively. The brand of the camera doesn't

really matter as long as the output is usable for data

extraction. Got it.

So quality and quality out. Once they have the raw video

footage, what happens next? Then comes the analysis and

tagging. The video is processed and

sophisticated software identifies key events within the

game. Every goal, every assist,

tackles, passes, shots, dribbles, you name it, it's all

tagged meticulously. That tagging must be crucial for

making it searchable and pulling out the stats, right?

Absolutely. That's what turns raw video into

structured data, and this is where the AI and computer vision

really earn their keep. Doing this manually across

thousands of games would be impossible.

So the computer vision, it watches the game like a human

would. In a sense, yes, but much faster

and more consistently. The algorithms automatically

track the position and movement of every single player on the

pitch throughout the entire match.

No need for manual tracking. Then the AI goes further.

It doesn't just track movement, it identifies specific actions.

It recognizes that was a pass, that was a shot, that was a

successful dribble, that was an interception.

It builds A detailed log of what each player did.

So it understands the context of the movements.

Precisely. And from recognizing these

actions, the AI AI can then calculate those performance

metrics we talked about, like a player's top speed during a

Sprint, the total distance they covered, how many sprints they

made. It gives you objective physical

data, right? And you mentioned earlier the AI

comparing young players to establish stars.

How does that actually function? That's a fascinating area, and

it's constantly being refined. Essentially, the AI learns to

identify patterns, statistical patterns, movement patterns,

stylistic traits in young players that resemble those of

famous international stars. So it might flag a young winger

whose dribbling style and acceleration profile look

statistically similar to say, a prime Arjun Robin.

The idea is to help scout spot players who might have that same

kind of potential or fit a similar role based on objective

similarities to prove an elite players.

It's a way to potentially identify future stars earlier.

And those 13 key stats, the attacking passing metrics you

mentioned first, Is pulling that data also automated?

Yes, the AI is central to compiling those summaries too.

It processes all the tagged events from the games in their

network and automatically extracts and organizes these key

statistics for each player profile.

This automation means scouts get those quick, digestible

performance overviews instantly. Which then fuels those targeted

searches you described. Exactly, the data collection and

AI analysis work together to enable that intelligent,

efficient searching. OK, so pulling all this

together, what are the biggest payouts for the clubs and scouts

using Eyeball? Why are so many top teams

jumping on board? Well, efficiency is a massive 1.

Scouts can assess players much much faster instead of watching

multiple full games live. They can use concise clips

highlights on the search filters to get an initial read very

quickly. Which must save money too.

Absolutely huge cost savings. Think of the reduction in

travel, flights, hotels, expenses for scouts being on the

road constantly. Eyeball Let's clubs cover global

markets effectively without needing a physical scouting

presence everywhere. That feels like it could level

the playing field a bit, right? The smaller club could

potentially scout globally in a way only the Giants could

before. That's definitely part of the

appeal, particularly for clubs with more limited resources.

It gives them access to a global talent pool, players in regions

they might never have been able to scout traditionally.

They can discover talent from diverse backgrounds, remote

areas that might otherwise have gone unnoticed.

And presumably the decisions they make are better informed

because of the data. It's not just a gut feeling.

That's the idea. Integrating the video with

searchable data provides A deeper, more objective

understanding of a player's strengths, weaknesses and

playing style. You move beyond purely

subjective opinions towards evidence based evaluation and

looking ahead. Things like AI predicting

tactical fit could make decisions even smarter.

It sounds transformative for clubs, but what about others in

the football world? Do players benefit agents,

Coaches. Yes, the benefits ripple

outwards. For players, especially talented

ones outside the biggest systems, it offers incredible

visibility. Just having their footage and

data on the platform increases their chances of being spotted

exponentially. For youth coaches, the platform

can be a powerful development tool, using the video and data

to give precise feedback to their players.

Agents obviously can use it to identify promising young talents

early and potentially find them bigger opportunities.

Even the amateur or youth clubs providing the footage gain

exposure for their players and potentially insights from the

data generated. It builds a kind of ecosystem.

Okay, it seems clear there are lots of advantages, but let's

put it head to head. How does eyeball really stack up

against traditional old school scouting?

Can we compare them directly on key things?

Yeah, we can definitely draw some comparisons.

Efficiency. Eyeball wins hands down.

Faster assessments, less time wasted.

Cost effectiveness. Again, Eyeball typically comes

out ahead due to dramatically reduced travel costs.

Geographical reach. Global reach with eyeball versus

the inherent limitations of where you can physically send

scouts in the traditional model. Objectivity.

Eyeball leans heavily on data and AI analytics, making it

arguably more objective than relying solely on a scouts

personal judgment, which can be subjective.

But what does traditional scouting still do better?

There must be advantages to seeing someone live.

Oh, absolutely, that's crucial. Traditional scouting allows for

that vital in person evaluation, assessing intangible qualities,

a player's mentality, their leadership potential, how they

react under pressure, their work ethic off the ball.

That's much harder to gauge reliably from video clips alone.

Right, you don't get the full picture of their personality or

how they handle setbacks just from highlights.

Exactly. And traditional scouting

provides a richer understanding of the context, the atmosphere

of the game, the tactical instructions, how a player

interacts with teammates and opponents in real time.

Video can sometimes lack that full context.

Also, traditional scouting relied heavily on those personal

networks and relationships which eyeball reduces dependence on.

And data eyeball obviously has tons.

Traditional scouting maybe less so, especially youth levels.

Yeah, data availability is a massive plus for Eyeball.

Historically, getting reliable, detailed performance data on

youth players was very difficult.

Eyeball makes that readily accessible.

So it sounds like neither is perfect on its own.

Is the future about choosing one or the other, or using both?

The overwhelming trend and what most forward thinking clubs are

doing is adopting a hybrid model.

They use platforms like Eyeball for the initial wide net

casting, identifying potential targets efficiently across the

globe, filtering based on data and video.

But then for the really promising candidates, they'll

still send scouts for that crucial in person evaluation

before making any final decisions.

So, technology for the heavy lifting, humans for the final

judgement. Pretty much.

Even Eyeball acknowledges that their system is fantastic for

identifying and assessing talent initially, but they know that

eventually clubs need to see the player live, talk to them,

understand the person behind the player.

It's about combining the strengths of both approaches.

That makes a lot of sense. We talked a lot about the

potential, but what's the real world track record?

Are clubs actually using this successfully?

Oh, the adoption rate is really telling.

A significant majority of clubs in Europe's Big 5 leagues are

clients. We're talking over 100

professional clubs worldwide. Premier League, League One,

Bundesliga, Siri ad teams are on board.

Any specific club endorsements? Yeah, quite a few public ones.

A Axis technical director, for instance, has called Eyeball

central to their scouting, saying it helps them cover

difficult markets. Saves time, boosts efficiency.

AC Milan's chief scout highlighted how it gives them a

global view without needing scouts everywhere speeding up

decisions. Brentford, known for their data

focus, renewed their partnership, specifically

mentioning the improved scouting data they get.

Those are big names vouching for it.

What about actual player transfers?

Are there concrete examples of players moving clubs because

they were spotted on eyeball? Yes, there are definitely

examples coming out now. Someone like Ray Angel moving

from a smaller French side to Juventus's reserves was

reportedly facilitated through eyeball.

Daniel Scarude going from Norway to the Ayatts Academy is another

one. Asan Udrago's move from Ivory

Coast to Charlotte FC in MLS. Even potentially high profile

moves like Mathistel's transfer to Bayern Munich, while complex,

likely involved early identification through platforms

like eyeball. Ibrahim Kanade was apparently

flagged by Anderlecht via eyeball well before he started

at EU 17 World Cup. Patrick Dorgas move to Man

United fits the profile of using these tools to find young talent

with high salon potential, and the very first eyeball links

transfer was Isaac Cassier to Lil back in 2022, showing it's

been having an impact for a while.

Right, so these aren't just theoretical benefits, it's

translating into actual player movement and recruitment

decisions at top clubs. That's compelling, but we need

balance. No system is perfect.

What are the potential downsides or limitations we should keep in

mind? You're right, it's important to

be realistic. We've touched on it, but it's

worth repeating. Eyeball is not a complete

replacement for the eye test. And in person scouting those

intangible qualities, assessing character video alone, struggles

with that. There's also the issue of

coverage. While it's vast, it's not

omniscient. There might still be

geographical gaps, or maybe less coverage and certain lower

leaves or specific age groups. The platform's effectiveness

depends entirely on the quality and comprehensiveness of its

database. And the data itself, how

reliable is the AI and can scout sometimes misinterpret it?

That's a really important point. The accuracy of the AI generated

data is crucial and scouts need the skills to interpret that

data correctly within context. There's always a risk of

becoming too reliant on the numbers and maybe overlooking a

player who doesn't fit the statistical mold but has that

unquantifiable spark or talent. The data should inform, not

dictate the final decision. Right.

Avoid paralysis by analysis. What about cost?

Is this accessible to everyone? Well, there's a subscription fee

for professional clubs to Get full access.

While it can save money overall compared to traditional scouting

networks, that initial subscription cost could still be

a barrier for smaller clubs working on very tight budgets.

And like any tech platform, there's always the potential for

technical glitches, downtime, stuff like that, which could

interrupt work. So reliability and support are

key. Good points.

So looking ahead then, what's next for eyeball specifically,

and maybe for tech and scouting more broadly?

Eyeball themselves have clear expansion plans.

Targeting the US and Latin American markets is high on

their agenda. Technologically, you can expect

constant refinement, better AI, more sophisticated computer

vision leading to even more accurate player tracking and

action identification, more nuanced data analytics, and

those futuristic features like the voice activated archetype

search will likely move closer to reality.

Tech just keeps getting smarter and more integrated.

I think so. We'll probably see more

integration between platforms like Eyeball and other club

systems, data analytics suites, maybe even club management

software creating a more seamless workflow.

The overall trend is undeniable. Technology's role in scouting is

only going to increase. Data, video, AI, they're

becoming fundamental tools. But the human element remains.

I firmly believe so. The future isn't about tech

replacing scouts, but about tech empowering scouts.

The most successful clubs will be the ones who best combine the

power of platforms like Eyeball with the crucial experience,

intuition and judgement of their human scouting experts.

Eyeball and similar tools will be central, but people still

make the final call. OK, so let's try and wrap this

up. Our deep dive suggests Eyeball

is, well, a genuinely revolutionary force in youth

football scouting, would you say?

Offering huge gains in efficiency, cutting costs,

opening up global talent pools, all powered by some pretty

advanced AI and video analysis. Yeah, that captures it well.

It's a major shift leveraging technology to solve long

standing challenges and identifying young players

through its video database and those powerful analytical tools.

But, and it's an important that we have to remember the human

side, that experience, Scout's eye, the ability to judge

character potential, those intangibles that still seems

absolutely critical and irreplaceable.

Couldn't agree more. It's an incredibly powerful

tool, hugely valuable, but it's one part of the puzzle and not

the whole solution. Human expertise remains vital.

So thinking about this whole shift, the rise of data and AI

and spotting talent, it leaves you wondering, doesn't it?

As this technology evolves further, how might our actual

definition of what talent even means in football begin to

change? And what new, maybe unexpected

roots into the professional game might open up for young players

around the world in the years ahead?

Something to chew on for sure.

Eyeball: AI Youth Football Scouting Revolution

About this episode